From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22416 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2021 08:17:15 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Apr 2021 08:17:15 -0000 Received: from oat.nine.sirjofri.de ([5.45.105.127]) by 1ess; Sat Apr 24 03:58:18 -0400 2021 Received: from sirjofri.de ([188.103.44.144]) by oat; Sat Apr 24 09:58:03 +0200 2021 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 07:58:02 +0000 (UTC) From: sirjofri To: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" <9front@9front.org> Message-ID: <84690bde-143b-4c7f-9a32-c445633124c0@sirjofri.de> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <84690bde-143b-4c7f-9a32-c445633124c0@sirjofri.de> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: webscale app-aware hosting database Subject: Re: [9front] ip/ftpd patch with tls support. Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Hey, 23.04.2021 23:29:59 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) : > james palmer writes: >> old challenge response auth and noworld checks are gone. >> if anybody misses these features i can add them and update the patch. > > Can you be a bit more detailed about what this means? I don't have the original mail, it seems, but the old challenge-response didn't work properly anyways. I tested the tool that generates the response from the challenge, and whatever challenge I entered, the response was always the same. Is ftpd with tls support the same as ftps? Then I'd really love this patch applied soon (but stable), it would be a better replacement for cifsd. That said, I can also test things out and read the code. sirjofri