From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ar.aichi-u.ac.jp ([202.250.160.40]) by ttr; Fri Aug 8 17:30:33 EDT 2014 Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([125.193.25.135]) by ar; Sat Aug 9 06:30:22 JST 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [9front] stats(1) suicide From: arisawa In-Reply-To: <91c3a80a602250b917bd8e1f641b1342@x301.inri> Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:30:45 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8495D484-033A-40A9-B1A3-4F234629288F@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: table SVG core GPU interface References: <91c3a80a602250b917bd8e1f641b1342@x301.inri> To: 9front@9front.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Hello, On 2014/08/09, at 1:01, sl@9front.org wrote: > 9front does not have a 9fat: command. I know that. I am using old 9fat because that is familiar to me. > Did you see any errors during the process > outlined above?=20 No. > you are now booting an old kernel (which does not have syscall 53) = with the new system. As I said old kernel just works after updating to the new system. (I keep kernel backup in 9fat when I attempt kernel update) I have confirmed the copied /n/9fat/9pc64 is same as that of created by = compile. Is that syscall 53 problem? Is the process below enough to get kew kernel? rm -rf /sys/src/* and copied the iso to the /sys/src and cd /sys/src && mk install cd /sys/src/9/pc64 mk If not, what should I add? Kenji Arisawa