From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.selfhost.de ([82.98.87.70]) by ewsd; Thu Sep 10 02:27:50 EDT 2020 Received: (qmail 29245 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2020 06:27:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx03.bss-wf.de) (postmaster@emdtgvmf.mail.selfhost.de@84.150.42.130) by mailout.selfhost.de with ESMTPA; 10 Sep 2020 06:27:31 -0000 Received: by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D97493DD7C; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:27:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from 9nb.pala (p5b3bc91e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.59.201.30]) by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A08A3DD7A; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:27:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <85974F541E859AF65CD882E57D735703@bss-wf.de> To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] [Bug] [PATCH] Mail cannot cope with multi-line header fields Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:27:27 +0200 From: theinicke@bss-wf.de In-Reply-To: <94E808D19B9A5E6B039FDEF2737B325A@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: scale-out cloud hypervisor-aware XMPP over SSL STM-oriented STM interface Hi, thanks for your reply. Concerning your question: This should not be a problem, at least if I have read the rfc correctly. We are getting white space in front of split lines for free, because in rfc2822 it says that the line breaks may only be inserted in front of white space. The relevant part is in section 2.2.3. -- Tobias Heinicke