From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20847 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2022 11:52:22 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Feb 2022 11:52:22 -0000 Received: from odoacer.turtle-trading.net ([93.241.193.16]) by 4ess; Fri Feb 11 06:44:41 -0500 2022 Received: from zenobia.turtle-trading.net ([192.168.2.111]) by odoacer.turtle-trading.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1nIULq-0000Zt-SB; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:34 +0100 Received: from benny by zenobia.turtle-trading.net with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nIULq-000oge-KC; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:34 +0100 From: Benjamin Riefenstahl To: Steve Simon Cc: 9front@9front.org References: <875ypmd3er.fsf@turtle-trading.net> <2B66F3F0-47FA-4FC4-B6CD-ECDDC16A514D@quintile.net> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2B66F3F0-47FA-4FC4-B6CD-ECDDC16A514D@quintile.net> (Steve Simon's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:07:03 +0000") Message-ID: <87iltlmxul.fsf@turtle-trading.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: structured compliant metadata SOAP over TOR cloud grid Subject: Re: [9front] Invers of partfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Hi Steve, Steve Simon writes: > unmount? I tried that, but although the name in /dev is called a "mountpoint" in the man page, unmount claims it doesn't know anything about it. > probably the easiest would be to put your tests in a script with > =E2=80=9Crfork ne=E2=80=9D at the top. > > this will ensure that when your script ends the namespace and > environment will evaporate. partfs will also close as its input is > closed as part of the namspace going. Ah, thinking in namespaces, nice! Yes, a subprocess like that should work fine, thank you. so long, benny