From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23093 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2020 05:47:16 -0000 Received: from ewsd.inri.net (107.191.116.128) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Dec 2020 05:47:16 -0000 Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]) by ewsd; Wed Dec 2 00:45:43 -0500 2020 Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id p6so508476plr.7 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:45:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=ZZqRl0T1hHwEtKaBnb9jDdAUT0fLV/tPXMSLOAsK/uE=; b=M7iju1nt7YnuP2khefbl9C6S+GoENH0Gqk1RRbzbptbMByEBEIwkFjDOFmBfMvLiDr 1JGX7IZKHw0EswM4MGryNRTdd2aaPSdyLkO3FO7yypMbJRn8Fekmp9nQKdgMXwdhgl31 t39DkRwJfiU03HVjsFtLGpg+vGKz7CqK0psuqOA5ih3DdwwFcHxvTqPO/t94Sw/SENFr dtn865awHbCmOHrCjlbUF4uDVWLM5/7upjln/RgUoI2Obffj+0AyEmpIf6pB66AWS8sl eMVykT+Tmb4Jp66MoYNu8yr67/BVDk88BjZXneJmId6JMByZSXSKm6Yoj84AX8Nzj0kj oeoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=ZZqRl0T1hHwEtKaBnb9jDdAUT0fLV/tPXMSLOAsK/uE=; b=Is8jpR7XLbyR/JgrftWg2KWBOPnwrOkFrItr6UdEWabD6VdCtGc+YYt47/RZJv3ylx VXFSsaTMzakZeh/cKvDBmhwRtx/jnui35cfdLctdBpgpBEr3tQavxTcrewddnYAVASit vDN/OS9qwlRzqmwX2Wqcn8uCopp4PjopDF/iRBeT3e6A884Pcb4w/AsAPYtKJ33oLsQG ZfNPb/p0EO0QZqBS9OyOuQdff7GwOGVFAbQ2qsVvQcy80BTrNxOCwvrsFxYCx6XgjU/V Hz/6G4HzBAAB7WbdEmvJOq2B9XhnSV2dnTYp9CA4GUvmDcaKlNakMDrFIIa8VTfkD88F wbRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323OHbMSoiC1lMASZPXZckLm/0T4sVO3zcpmZI/xMgSPw2/VFrh Y2MkAtyILkHln+PNevknDTGOilppWpY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypYgfy5NM5MuwvkleqZLT3LbFAi8bOWQRcewLSfG6n/MkmH9C+1ckFCWejMcyenzSPHEh8ag== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1987:: with SMTP id mv7mr875597pjb.66.1606887933886; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:45:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from delllaptop.lockywolf.net (vultr-seoul-openbsd.lockywolf.net. [141.164.61.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12sm748593pfc.84.2020.12.01.21.45.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:45:33 -0800 (PST) References: <871rg8dfnz.fsf@delllaptop.lockywolf.net> <2CBE3EA1DC65A1D691F7EAEB82F90D0A@eigenstate.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Vladimir Nikishkin To: ori@eigenstate.org Cc: 9front@9front.org In-reply-to: <2CBE3EA1DC65A1D691F7EAEB82F90D0A@eigenstate.org> Message-ID: <87y2igbx06.fsf@delllaptop.lockywolf.net> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:45:28 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtual open SSL over HTTP scripting session plugin base Subject: Re: [9front] Cannot install 9front-8013.d9e940a768d1.amd64.iso due to network issues Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk I should have read the log output better. The `copydist` task actually fails with the `bucket 9 is full` error. I expected the installer to fail too at failed tasks. No wonder it can't find what does not exist. I didn't notice that such a large drive would be needed, as the FQA says, 30Gb. I just took the .iso size, multiplied its size by 10, and expected that to be enough. Anyway, thank you everyone. ori@eigenstate.org writes: > Quoth Vladimir Nikishkin : >> >> Sure, it may be irrelevant to the network at all. I have to idea, to be >> honest, this is my first time doing anything with 9front. >> >> But the `nbdsetup` task is otherwise called "setup network >> configuration", so I thought it might be relevant. >> >> `/n/newfs` is indeed empty. >> > > I strongly suggest qemu or vmware instead of virtualbox; there's > a history of emulation bugs on vbox, so it's very much a "you're > on your own" platform. I've been told it's better now, but I don't > think anyone tests it regularly. > > And, yeah -- what josuah said, this is definitely an issue with > mounting the install disk, and not the network. Make sure that > there weren't any errors reaming it or anything. -- Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf) (Laptop)