From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 26960 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2021 10:09:55 -0000
Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Nov 2021 10:09:55 -0000
Received: from oat.nine.sirjofri.de ([5.45.105.127]) by 4ess; Wed Nov 17 17:00:12 -0500 2021
Received: from sirjofri.de ([95.90.218.112]) by oat; Wed Nov 17 22:35:36 +0100 2021
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: sirjofri <sirjofri+ml-9front@sirjofri.de>
To: hiro <9front@9front.org>
Message-ID: <889615f4-05d2-4993-9a4a-0d6f9719e141@sirjofri.de>
In-Reply-To: <05860f2f-c72d-442b-9fe8-7c4360f2f06b@sirjofri.de>
References: <98f90ae5-7ae7-4277-a6ca-12c6d7532371@pixelhero.dev> <78C6E67A-62A4-4F5E-B79E-6EF33F2A62B4@quintile.net> <CAFSF3XPMwy9mkXWOLOgjnnftZXUorN8o=8bC8_3GzVBsi7NFsg@mail.gmail.com> <3f20b0e4-7893-4507-a512-9faa9b880e80@sirjofri.de> <CAFSF3XNF37tPS-WFjqCvWrZkzSad0pARnD7BaT9h79SQE32D9w@mail.gmail.com> <05860f2f-c72d-442b-9fe8-7c4360f2f06b@sirjofri.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Correlation-ID: <889615f4-05d2-4993-9a4a-0d6f9719e141@sirjofri.de>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: RESTful object-oriented metadata interface framework-aware hosting 
Subject: Re: [9front] cfs, aan and network recommendations
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Hiro,

I didn't receive your mail to this address, only to my other address 
(whatever's going wrong with the mailing list).

Readahead or not, transferring gigabytes of data or not is here the 
question. If the version is the same and I don't need to download the 
data cfs gives me the cached file from the local disk.

In theory. I have no measured times and stuff like that.

sirjofri