From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22255 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2021 02:49:31 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Apr 2021 02:49:31 -0000 Received: from mail-41103.protonmail.ch ([185.70.41.103]) by 1ess; Sat Apr 24 22:42:54 -0400 2021 Received: from mail-02.mail-europe.com (mail-0201.mail-europe.com [51.77.79.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail-41103.protonmail.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FSNVn2c3lz4wwdV for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail-41103.protonmail.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com header.b="hOIuKEmw" Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:57:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1619294226; bh=SYRRgszY4LCJRwl9PStxJOPcyeg1gP/ZyS1HCBk64XY=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hOIuKEmwkCnxfzWXjfiZC12bnuQewkXFnH3c7LbsAFy4am/lWvjbD/C0JFq3bnApa P5ES5GuTlImjhk59JpG82vE248KnPX5qrmoErsgvAcM7KO7FiayTJIx72VKTsuHCQ3 EE/JXTqAj1ItpzublTFW0aPaDKmK4QVzGA5XaGNQ= To: "9front@9front.org" <9front@9front.org> From: Michael Enders Message-ID: <89HSlrgjEz2mv0WgXyGBe88CXgoK8t4x8JonlDgIaPE20t6CeD_g03c0omVlnhGOWAwtQGlwdsRUymD-nwywPrAyWX5SDF1r1gI0yMnyGkM=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: decentralized dependency method Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] aux/wacom: prevent "no concurrent reads please" error when moving the pen too fast and support screen tilt Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > > maybe we need to implement pid reusal... > maybe nowadays it would be fine to be wasteful about this. What's the issue with wrapping pids?