From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 18037 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2021 01:15:38 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Jul 2021 01:15:38 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 1ess; Mon Jul 26 21:05:11 -0400 2021 Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-225.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.225]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 42f627bd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8EF9D0FDB7D0AF622272DFD20B9AE504@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:04:47 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: lifecycle module grid Subject: Re: [9front] Re: sysupdate: no common ancestors Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Anthony Martin : > An update: > > Stuart sent me his pack and index files and, > fortunately, it looks like they're all valid > so far (I'm working backwards from the most > recent). > > However, two commits (c38fcb5dc and 2c1727e55) > are completely missing from any pack. I wonder > why git/fetch never asked the remote for those > refs or why they were never sent. > > Also, curiously, one commit (be36c092a) appears > in two packs. > > I'm going to keep thinking about this but my > current notes are appended below. > > Cheers, > Anthony > Hm. Is it possible that we had mistakenly updated the refs, and then pruned commits out of the request in subsequent updates?