From: Daniel Morandini <danielmorandini@me.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] rpi4 wifi USB dongle
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:40:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8F461D18-758E-4E6D-B5E4-9188C9B2DD61@me.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XOzHvie_thWskEDA7PMC+gfvuZ_1+t-VRcnevDgxCudSw@mail.gmail.com>
> An ethernet client is a computer with a mac address.
>
> Given you have a group of M clients and another group of N clients and
> you want to connect them, plug the M clients into a switch with M+1
> ports on one side and the N clients into a switch with N+1 ports on
> the other side, then use the remaining port and a long cable to
> connect them together.
>
> Imagine now the M-AP is a wifi router, and you want to connect it to
the N (not AP) over wifi.
>
> but here when wifi comes into play not every client is the same. you
> have many wifi stations and just one wifi *ap*, if we make M-AP the
> wifi AP, you can bridge all the M clients just fine. that works on AP
> side.
You mean “that works on M side" right?
> But if you want to bridge a wifi *station* on the other side, you can
> not. a station can only bridge N=1 mac addresses into a wifi.
I’m getting there: practically I would have to make N-AP connect as a
client to M-AP to keep the only one ap limitation, but at that point
the new link would not be able to mux more than one ethernet client
becoming useless for my usecase, did I get it right?
> We have some code in 9front called mat damon, which is like NAT, but
> for MAC addresses instead of IP addresses. This way one mac address
> can hide all the N other mac addresses and translate between them. But
> that's obviously a layer violation, a stupid hack that only exists due
> to the limitation of wifi.
:D
dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-03 11:10 Daniel Morandini
2021-03-03 11:42 ` kemal
2021-03-03 12:17 ` hiro
2021-03-03 14:07 ` Daniel Morandini
2021-03-03 14:43 ` Stanley Lieber
2021-03-03 14:55 ` hiro
2021-03-03 16:56 ` Julien Blanchard
2021-03-03 17:19 ` hiro
2021-03-04 8:57 ` Daniel Morandini
2021-03-04 10:09 ` hiro
2021-03-04 10:14 ` hiro
2021-03-04 10:40 ` Daniel Morandini [this message]
2021-03-04 11:04 ` hiro
2021-03-04 11:21 ` Daniel Morandini
2021-04-23 6:38 ` unobe
2021-04-23 8:26 ` hiro
2021-04-23 16:50 ` unobe
2021-03-04 12:22 ` Noam Preil
2021-03-04 13:18 ` hiro
2021-03-04 13:43 ` Noam Preil
2021-03-03 17:21 ` Kurt H Maier
2021-03-05 18:25 ` tony
2021-03-03 16:05 ` fulton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8F461D18-758E-4E6D-B5E4-9188C9B2DD61@me.com \
--to=danielmorandini@me.com \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).