From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [10.1.10.1] ([104.59.85.219]) by ewsd; Sun Apr 12 15:42:18 EDT 2020 Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:42:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9front] mothra: proposal To: 9front@9front.org From: Stanley Lieber Message-ID: <8FDF4F65-C444-4F8D-9917-0C890AA4B90A@stanleylieber.com> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: app content-driven controller On April 12, 2020 3:21:15 PM EDT, ori@eigenstate=2Eorg wrote: >Finally got around to preparing patches, which should apply >cleanly on top of 9front mothra=2E However: > >> 3=2E) implement -b flag for dark mode, white-on-black text=2E[2] >> a=2E) similar to rio -b, and vt -b=2E >> 1=2E) users are free to implement any desired >> schemes beyond default and -b by configuring >> the included =2Ec files=2E > >I didn't see this change in the tarballs=2E There just seemed to >be two different mothras, one with black and one with white >schemes=2E > >Patches attached: > >font=2Epatch: Change font back to original=2E >panel=2Epatch: Reduce drawing clutter from libpanel >monochrome=2Epatch; Make the color scheme monochrome (all-white) >plumb=2Epatch: add plumber > >TODO: > - Make libpanel render a bit more in the style of rio and > everything else=2E > - Merge in a version of mothra with -b, if I get it=2E thanks! i did not actually implement -b, as such=2E my concept was roughly= : mothra=2Ewhite as default, and mothra=2Eblack as -b=2E the only differenc= e between my mothra=2Ewhite and mothra=2Eblack is (should be) the display c= olors=2E sl