From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B9284C0
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Wed, 22 May 2024 21:41:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Wed May 22 15:39:39 -0400 2024
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org;
	s=20200506; t=1716406762;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=k710VJP0lf8ec6cmZQfOdg32RJhGf/YdV6ZOhomdc48=;
	b=qG2fOltzExrnO37jBfL2a+Xp5sRLDyDx3WkPAMWLMgoHNz9JVgSFTPBzFJTiZeiD5IKv2L
	6lRRM46Vc/1iTAb4FFHSX8ndX/twscaibhbOX4UNxEW7b5PF0SaULslaygsgpPk9qrEG0A
	837zYKpLJMLQCqdE5LgBFYNMFv9kT0s=
Received: from [192.168.168.200] (<unknown> [207.45.82.38])
	by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a62acfee (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Wed, 22 May 2024 14:39:22 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <90314498-dc6f-4b4c-bfb7-cda119360980@posixcafe.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:39:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <6E8DD2D34EF7C6D15E90B95F1977A5E4@smtp.pobox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jacob Moody <moody@posixcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <6E8DD2D34EF7C6D15E90B95F1977A5E4@smtp.pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: content-addressed property factory SOAP over SSL component dependency backend 
Subject: Re: [9front] drawterm: add .gitignore
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5/22/24 13:10, Romano wrote:
> On Wed May 22 10:52:45 -0700 2024, moody@posixcafe.org wrote:
>> I'm still not interested in it for the other reasons stated.
> 
> Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't reply directly to the other part of
> your message because I didn't want you to think that I was
> pushing back against that reason for inclusion of the patch.
> The reason you stated re: who develops and with what makes
> sense, and I didn't think there was anything more to be said
> about that.
> 
> I restricted my reply to your statement about the format
> of gitignore.

Look, there are clearly some rough feelings from our other discussion.
I am not trying to tone police and dictate strict rules for how people need to talk here.
I was at the time just trying to explain why I got frustrated with how the conversation had gone.
Part of that was communicating how I had interpreted your mail at the time, and trying to explain what I
think the etiquette is for how conversations and discussions should go here.
I should also mention that I am not the rule maker here, I am simply speaking from my experience of how
others have traditionally got along. If I am wrong I hope someone would mention their own idea of how
these things should go.

I don't want to turn every discussion in to this.
So I will try to abstain from further discussions of your patches.

Thanks,
moody