From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 19337 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2021 10:13:14 -0000
Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Nov 2021 10:13:14 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 4ess; Mon Nov  1 17:55:06 -0400 2021
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1635803699;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=7inJ8iqJg+HW3JOCit69GgAkGSofHMIC7qDWfvgAzu4=;
	b=Lxxoh6xFkjsebhW6bE4252E2+nyOXTkBBwPu0OURkPj9jq2TdRJtDwfY72nL+mCCmapEc7
	JjXVpFEgNE3Cj5vRId5SOX5k8Sgruftx8eyhgKoxqCICIjSdY0JH9V0PDJ4GipOUiaUm4y
	fOHtYX6ozsrnH71zztlOPvVlXDPUL+A=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1f3cbfd6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 1 Nov 2021 14:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9150906C841A3544350CF774D27B58E1@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 22:54:57 +0100
From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO93rcUa-1RnAXOosPj77PwFh7fh2-9PwfVzHB5AQ_jU+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: extensible leveraged metadata-aware database metadata 
Subject: Re: [9front] mainly just spelling and typos
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

> Most are self-explanatory, but:
> 1. nusb(4) is reverted to match what's in plan9.ini(8) (and I add a hyphen)
> 2. in ps(1), try expanding
> 	(old) 	Waiting for more of a critical 
> 	(new) 	Waiting for more of a critical resource
>    when  is, say, "memory".
> 
> Diskparts(8) erroneously claims sd[C-H] for IDE controllers; no
> diff is attached because I wouldn't know what to replace it with.
> Why should the manual single out IDE controllers in the current year?

Hi,

Thanks for the patches.  Comments:

- The ascii and ls patches are pointless pikeshedding
- dosmnt: I don't think that this is necessary, and afaict it could
  conflict with USB dos filesystems already mounted on /shr
- nusb(4): `device identifier' is what is used for USB in general,
  I think it can be left alone
- ps(1): I don't understand the point of the first part, it looked
  just fine to me

Everything else is fine imho, others may disagree with that or my
own comments.

Cheers,
qwx