From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29713 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2022 00:42:22 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Jul 2022 00:42:22 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Sat Jul 2 20:41:13 -0400 2022 Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-225.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.225]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 51df1264 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 17:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9168323361AFF65D058AFEB97CD61AF8@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:41:00 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: core NoSQL singleton cloud Subject: Re: [9front] iounit: bump it across the board Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth ori@eigenstate.org: > Quoth noam@pixelhero.dev: > > > > Are those buffers static? If they're dynamically allocated, I > > doubt it'd be an issue; I'm thinking of a use case where e.g. > > file systems use large iounit but drivers use a small one. > > > > That seems best of both worlds: minimal consumption where more > > isn't needed, higher resource usage where it's beneficial and > > cheap. > > Try it out and report back -- tuning this easily is why I added > the constant to libc. > anyone give this a shot yet? (not going to commit until it's been good and tested for a few people)