From: Dmad <dmadhatr@sdf.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] 9Front Drawterm Code 139 Sig 11 SIGSEGV
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 01:39:15 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <921e22d1-a126-4009-ac17-c1c730769b3e@sdf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <931efd84-9713-5263-02ca-8dc5a93e8304@sdf.org>
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Dmad wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Dmad <dmadhatr@sdf.org>
> Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
> To: 9front@9front.org
> Subject: Re: [9front] 9Front Drawterm Code 139 Sig 11 SIGSEGV
>
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Dmad wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 16:04:28 +0000 (UTC)
>> From: Dmad <dmadhatr@sdf.org>
>> Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
>> To: 9front@9front.org
>> Subject: Re: [9front] 9Front Drawterm Code 139 Sig 11 SIGSEGV
>>
>> On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Dmad wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 13:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
>>> From: Dmad <dmadhatr@sdf.org>
>>> Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
>>> To: 9front@9front.org
>>> Subject: Re: [9front] 9Front Drawterm Code 139 Sig 11 SIGSEGV
>>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Amavect wrote:
>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 20:10:29 -0500
>>>> From: Amavect <amavect@gmail.com>
>>>> Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
>>>> To: 9front@9front.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [9front] 9Front Drawterm Code 139 Sig 11 SIGSEGV
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:21?PM Dmad <dmadhatr@sdf.org> wrote:
>>>>> Let me know if anyone has any advice on how to debug/troubleshoot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really appreciate your time, beat the shit out of the internet trying
>>>>> to
>>>>> find an answer on the lists/forums/etc.
>>>> Do you know how to get a backtrace with gdb or any other debugger?
>>>> For gdb, just pass the executable filename, type r to run.
>>>> Trigger the crash, and type bt for a backtrace.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, you can recompile with "-O0 -ggdb" in the CFLAGS.
>>>> If that changes the behavior, that's a hint as to what's wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Amavect
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Amavect, I started reading up on using backtrace with gdb yesterday as
>>> well- so that too is solid advice - thanks. Will continue to hunt.
>>> Will
>>> run with the recompile and the CFLAGS you gave.
>>>
>>> Apprciate it, thanks..
>>>
>>> dmadhatr@sdf.org
>>> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ok, here is what I found:
>>
>> dmadhatr@dmadhatr-freetbsd-pc ~/drawterm (front)> gdb -ex=run --args
>> ./drawterm -h 205.166.XX.XXX -a 205.166.XX.XXX -u glenda -r
>> /home/dmadhatr/Public/
>> GNU gdb (GDB) 13.1 [GDB v13.1 for FreeBSD]
>> Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
>> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>> Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
>> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-portbld-freebsd13.2".
>> Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
>> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>> <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
>> Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
>> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>.
>>
>> For help, type "help".
>> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
>> Reading symbols from ./drawterm...
>> Starting program: /usr/home/dmadhatr/drawterm/drawterm -h 205.166.XX.XXX
>> -a 205.166.XX.XXX -u glenda -r /home/dmadhatr/Public/
>> [New LWP 130212 of process 59751]
>> [New LWP 130213 of process 59751]
>> [New LWP 130217 of process 59751]
>>
>> Thread 1 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> Address not mapped to object.
>> 0x0000000000294488 in tas (x=x@entry=0x0) at tas.c:9
>> 9 asm( "movl $1, %%eax\n\t"
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x0000000000294488 in tas (x=x@entry=0x0) at tas.c:9
>> #1 0x000000000028dd5b in canlock (lk=0x0) at lock.c:62
>> #2 lock (lk=lk@entry=0x0) at lock.c:71
>> #3 0x0000000000226cdf in incref (r=0x0) at chan.c:57
>> #4 walk (cp=cp@entry=0x7fffffffdf18, names=0x800d2c780, nnames=2,
>> nomount=nomount@entry=0, nerror=nerror@entry=0x7fffffffdeec) at chan.c:847
>> #5 0x0000000000227ed3 in namec (aname=0x800c3ce80 "./dev/label",
>> aname@entry=0x800c3ce60 "./dev/label", amode=amode@entry=0,
>> omode=omode@entry=0, perm=perm@entry=0) at chan.c:1273
>> #6 0x0000000000242e1b in _sysstat (name=0x0, name@entry=0x800c3ce60
>> "./dev/label", buf=buf@entry=0x800c57050, n=n@entry=115) at sysfile.c:612
>> #7 0x00000000002443c4 in sysstat (name=name@entry=0x800c3ce60
>> "./dev/label", buf=buf@entry=0x800c57050 "dev", n=n@entry=115) at
>> sysfile.c:1099
>> #8 0x00000000002894b7 in dirstat (name=0x800c3ce60 "./dev/label") at
>> dirstat.c:23
>> #9 0x00000000002481ca in file (parent=0x800c49310,
>> name=name@entry=0x800d4df52 "label") at exportfs.c:284
>> #10 0x0000000000248cc7 in Xwalk (t=0x800d44350) at exportsrv.c:199
>> #11 0x0000000000247820 in exportfs (fd=fd@entry=6) at exportfs.c:99
>> #12 0x000000000022211e in ncpu (host=<optimized out>, cmd=<optimized out>)
>> at cpu.c:239
>> #13 0x0000000000222901 in cpubody () at cpu.c:384
>> #14 0x0000000000285f3a in guimain () at x11.c:1259
>> #15 0x000000000022275a in cpumain (argc=0, argc@entry=9, argv=<optimized
>> out> , argv@entry=0x7fffffffe5f0) at cpu.c:335
>> #16 0x00000000002218cc in main (argc=9, argv=0x7fffffffe5f0) at main.c:67
>>
>> ----- First Run with gdb and bt -----
>>
>> ---- Recompiling .drawterm with CFLAGS recommending and running again ----
>> # Recompiling with -O0 -ggdb for CONF=freebsd make
>> # tar'd /proc/59751 to debug folder for trouble shooting
>>
>> Was not able to get a bt stack after compiling with additional CFLAGs
>>
>> Same error message, drawterm unable to chdir (see first email).
>>
>>
>> dmadhatr@sdf.org
>> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
>>
>>
>
> From what I've been reading on these errors, increasing kern.maxfiles in
> /etc/sysctl.conf may be a good initial fix.
>
> dmadhatr@sdf.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
>
Changing the stack limit and proc/file sizes did not yield an additional
correction to the initial issue. Appears to be some type of bug in either
.drawterm or
some c libs and how the virtual link from /usr/home/ to /home is handled -
do not know enough yet to intelligently
share more here. Got some additional data, will keep plugging away.
gdb and bt are working fine, figured out the cores - thanks again.
Cheers.
dmadhatr@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-24 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 19:11 Dmad
2023-09-22 19:55 ` hiro
2023-09-23 13:44 ` Dmad
2023-09-23 1:10 ` Amavect
2023-09-23 13:52 ` Dmad
2023-09-23 16:04 ` Dmad
2023-09-23 17:32 ` Dmad
2023-09-24 1:39 ` Dmad [this message]
2023-09-24 2:28 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2023-09-24 2:40 ` Dmad
2023-09-24 3:11 ` Dmad
2023-09-24 3:24 ` Dmad
2023-09-24 4:44 ` Amavect
2023-09-24 15:13 ` Dmad
2023-09-27 4:45 ` Amavect
2023-09-25 13:54 ` Xiao-Yong Jin
2023-09-25 14:47 ` Dmad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=921e22d1-a126-4009-ac17-c1c730769b3e@sdf.org \
--to=dmadhatr@sdf.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).