From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mta01.eonet.ne.jp ([203.140.81.20]) by ur; Fri May 27 03:52:58 EDT 2016
Received: from titan.jitaku.localdomain (101-141-38-58f1.osk3.eonet.ne.jp [101.141.38.58])
	by mailmsa11.mozu.eo.k-opti.ad.jp  with ESMTP id u4R7qqNZ018539
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:52:52 +0900
Message-ID: <9403003f7f71373b0af306df532cd86e@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9front@hera.eonet.ne.jp
Subject: 9pc64 terminal boot slow was not true
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:52:52 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: scale-out full-stack solution 

I reported several months ago, that 9pc64 terminal boot
very slow such that 1 min after userID input to secstore
input etc.

It was not true, because today, I tested SONY Vaio VGN-FZ31B 
with 9pc64 kernel, and got reasonable speed to boot.
The slow terminal's ether chip is 8169, very old.

Kenji