Re: [9front] VMX improvements + AVX

[ori@eigenstate.org]

Quoth Stuart Morrow <morrow.stuart@gmail.com>:
> I have to admit I don't understand why this type of thing actually
> needs to be a patch. The kernel needs to know what instructions the
> program is liable to use? Why? My Nemo's-book understanding of this
> stuff: the kernel sets up an allotment of time, and then the user
> process goes to town within the constraints set up for it. Can't
> really imagine why certain instructions would need special
> arrangements or what the mechanism might be.

A process is a collection of registers, memory, and file descriptors
(mostly). So, switching processes means that you need to swap out the
active resources.

AVX adds more registers, so there are new things that need to be
swapped. That means two things:

0) the kernel needs to know that these registers exist, so that it
   can save them and restore them when switching procs.
1) it's not on automatically, and userspace can't turn it on,
   because if the kernel didn't know how to save them across
   processes, one process would step all over the others new
   registers.

(usually) new instructions that don't add new registers need no
work in the OS.