From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 2301 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2022 05:48:37 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Oct 2022 05:48:37 -0000
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]) by 9front; Fri Oct 14 01:45:14 -0400 2022
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CE9140DD9
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:45:10 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id
	:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=wig4bANui+CKBR1/TUADqh8ao
	TBjY5dRNt33bEhxv9Y=; b=eVrjisr96JekXzhq5ALiI3WVVwd7ieSMFOjl0myla
	VHmf8kDCGPFWMNTA1V2DTL/n8hWZllCp9MGUmcV61mWmIu4i7sSXNSGrqZljK8u2
	o42iPOZUUSO9uGMulYxvfQr5BXnSeO8jAAw3Cp9HyMMGdflax8ZEijIZyjCpCkNx
	qA=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC8C140DD8
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:45:10 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
Received: from strider.localdomain (unknown [75.237.206.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73C2B140DD6
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
Message-ID: <94F700F55A896082CE708F97BD64CE2C@smtp.pobox.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 22:45:06 -0700
From: unobe@cpan.org
In-Reply-To: <DC490D1CB150DC590E317B5ED66FD09D@eigenstate.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
 5D4688B6-4B83-11ED-B052-2AEEC5D8090B-09620299!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: flexible hosting markup general-purpose control 
Subject: Re: 9p2000.ix (Was Re: [9front] hackathon writeup)
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth ori@eigenstate.org:
> Quoth Jacob Moody <moody@mail.posixcafe.org>:
> > On 8/18/22 17:33, Stuart Morrow wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2022, Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
> > >> Where in the tree is it?   Their commit history is a disaster area and
> > >> there doesn't seem to be any explicit reference to it, nor documentation
> > >> regarding it.
> > > 
> > > Errrrr, devmnt?
> > 
> > https://github.com/fjballest/nixMarkIV/blob/master/port/devmnt.c
> > 
> > I think you're talking about this? Based on the context you seem
> > to be talking about it in.

It's also in his nix.markII repo.

Doing a diff of devmnt.c found in nix.markII and 9front's latest
devmnt.c doesn't look too wild, but I have yet to look at the other
affected files mentioned in Nemo's article.

> 
> see also:
> 
> 	https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.4876&rep=rep1&type=pdf

https://lsub.org/books-papers/ also have some related texts as well
(including the one ori mentioned).

I just saw https://linus.schreibt.jetzt/posts/qemu-9p-performance.html
on hackernews, which reminded me of this thread.