Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf)

[Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>]

On January 6, 2021 4:07:38 AM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>well it's all new to me, too.
>
>dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
>
>this line, seems to suggest that gmail.com has to go into quarantine
>because of a dmarc subdomain policy. but no gmail subdomain is used so
>it shouldn't apply. it feels like your mail server is incorrectly
>looking at sp=.
>
>
>
>On 1/6/21, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>> On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be
>>>complaining about gmail...
>>>
>>>On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>>>> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part:
>>>>>
>>>>>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>>>>       dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
>>>>>header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW;
>>>>>       spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net
>>>>>designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender)
>>>>>smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net;
>>>>>       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
>>>>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; Tue
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail
>>>>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough
>>>>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM).
>>>>>
>>>>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain
>>>>>> quarantine decision:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>>>>>        dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
>>>>>> header.s=20161025 header.b=frcOH6pW;
>>>>>>        spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net
>>>>>> designates 216.126.196.35 as permitted sender)
>>>>>> smtp.mailfrom=9front-bounces@1ess.inri.net;
>>>>>>        dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE)
>>>>>> header.from=gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine should
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> apply
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Jonas Amoson <jonas.amoson@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf)
>>>>>> To: 9front@9front.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load
>>>>>> all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a
>>>>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes
>>>>>> the loading slow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading
>>>>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe
>>>>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front
>>>>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load,
>>>>>> that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Jonas
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today. hopefully
>>>> gmail
>>>> will stop complaining once it propagates.
>>>>
>>>> sl
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> you'll have to walk me through that. all i see is google demanding to see
>> our papers.
>>
>> sl
>>
>

i don't understand. i don't think my server is writing that line at all. there is no mention of dmarc or quarantine in the ups source. the stuff you're quoting seems to be coming from google. what am i missing here?

sl