From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 27938 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2021 15:53:07 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Jan 2021 15:53:07 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Wed Jan 6 10:23:48 -0500 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([104.59.85.219]) by 5ess; Wed Jan 6 10:23:47 -0500 2021 Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:23:45 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: <13671796-C244-493E-905C-15F3DDE1693B@stanleylieber.com> <0FAE354A-A6ED-428E-A9E2-E7D439E04499@stanleylieber.com> Message-ID: <9514DC52-9435-44DB-B8B3-2B66609D1318@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: RESTful stable enhancement-oriented database-oriented generator Subject: Re: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On January 6, 2021 4:07:38 AM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >well it's all new to me, too=2E > >dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efrom=3Dgmail= =2Ecom > >this line, seems to suggest that gmail=2Ecom has to go into quarantine >because of a dmarc subdomain policy=2E but no gmail subdomain is used so >it shouldn't apply=2E it feels like your mail server is incorrectly >looking at sp=3D=2E > > > >On 1/6/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >> On January 5, 2021 5:39:05 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>i mean, somehow the 9front mailing list software seems to be >>>complaining about gmail=2E=2E=2E >>> >>>On 1/5/21, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>>> On January 5, 2021 4:10:19 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>>>i did not manage to quote the relevant part: >>>>> >>>>>Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; >>>>> dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmail= =2Ecom >>>>>header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; >>>>> spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri= =2Enet >>>>>designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >>>>>smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; >>>>> dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) header=2Efr= om=3Dgmail=2Ecom >>>>>Received: from mail-vk1-f180=2Egoogle=2Ecom ([209=2E85=2E221=2E180]) = by 1ess; Tue >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>>the old server, ewsd seems to have done the same, but somehow gmail >>>>>didn't take it serious (perhaps people have trained gmail well enough >>>>>by manually pressing NOT SPAM)=2E >>>>> >>>>>On 1/5/21, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>>>> the 9front mailing list seems to be making a weird subdomain >>>>>> quarantine decision: >>>>>> >>>>>> Authentication-Results: mx=2Egoogle=2Ecom; >>>>>> dkim=3Dneutral (body hash did not verify) header=2Ei=3D@gmai= l=2Ecom >>>>>> header=2Es=3D20161025 header=2Eb=3DfrcOH6pW; >>>>>> spf=3Dpass (google=2Ecom: domain of 9front-bounces@1ess=2Ein= ri=2Enet >>>>>> designates 216=2E126=2E196=2E35 as permitted sender) >>>>>> smtp=2Emailfrom=3D9front-bounces@1ess=2Einri=2Enet; >>>>>> dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DQUARANTINE dis=3DNONE) >>>>>> header=2Efrom=3Dgmail=2Ecom >>>>>> >>>>>> but the from header does not specify a subdomine, so quarantine sho= uld >>>>>> not >>>>>> apply >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>> From: Jonas Amoson >>>>>> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200 >>>>>> Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsu= rf) >>>>>> To: 9front@9front=2Eorg >>>>>> >>>>>> It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to l= oad >>>>>> all the symbols from the binary=2E It is the process of checking if= a >>>>>> symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that mak= es >>>>>> the loading slow=2E >>>>>> >>>>>> Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading >>>>>> time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster)=2E Philip= pe >>>>>> reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec)=2E >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9fron= t >>>>>> repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to lo= ad, >>>>>> that it matters=2E But it might be that it doesn't harm anything ei= ther=2E >>>>>> >>>>>> /Jonas >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> i failed to get the ptr record updated until earlier today=2E hopeful= ly >>>> gmail >>>> will stop complaining once it propagates=2E >>>> >>>> sl >>>> >>> >> >> you'll have to walk me through that=2E all i see is google demanding to= see >> our papers=2E >> >> sl >> > i don't understand=2E i don't think my server is writing that line at all= =2E there is no mention of dmarc or quarantine in the ups source=2E the stu= ff you're quoting seems to be coming from google=2E what am i missing here? sl