From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by ewsd; Fri Jul 31 06:00:00 EDT 2020 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DBEA64 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:59:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=efa66aO/+koOl7y/xzd0qjCyWNh73lM pUmxCozpQ/Ug=; b=pXISO7zB8TvVn1LfI87tagCEK+oyn+3ft5hXfDJtTnxD8Ua fz7BgFMYvTSMvEHYGd2098jmPTXhS4DZ4sOqa0I0Pv3xpxtKfeosA7/hYiAZUmbV 0P40HNGPj1iZ+NKNEjceQj2CCGhg2y5IUwdqY/tqvY8Gc48491nDW2E+A4p8zeDi HCCkA7BREDxHvyWSNu2wj8f/8EYOSL6YwH5IEPk8MECRLd9MMLD+fiX84nWJGmII S8T4Zcr1RYvCGYHFx40NIHg8gclnxrq+Wn96t3+z64mYgpSNppJ4UQ9haKTf4mVq /oVHBvZ/aeW2fEw0rJZrZl/hVjsLcjDE+5GgJow== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=efa66a O/+koOl7y/xzd0qjCyWNh73lMpUmxCozpQ/Ug=; b=E+SHI6BAg7af7iy8vBumk1 Mt/EmwIIpuNXU3e8bbaxilK74UtbsIGk3cBDldOAhTwNzLpoLC9mDdBI+m2LnHF+ B8CmWKUoq5uN54LOgxrpxx2xCeYdz44QSEWx/Nonr9ZJyw9EPLfuWJOMmZ5mkA2q l4P+nPUwW3sJdQuAoO2R7Kc0H2DMlZ9zOK6gYZMxlTCJC6Q8Al6eIYCNWsxFc4hm CoFEi+4YtLmliqe4N4jElHY+7QgAOyV2tzjHDtTxEwNzK+o25kbqu4M2xTSY2Gt1 UyOiLhDk6HMjCM/G33wYyFxt/3YglxeOlMf0mpmTwrCjKxkzlO4RVf4Bze/VTQxw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrieekgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfgthhhrghnucfirghruggvnhgvrhdfuceovggvkhgvvgeh jeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgefhteffhfffhfeife ehieeigeevtddvvefhteduheffveeiffetudeffeetteeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehvihht rghnuhhovhgrrdgtohhmpdgtrggvrhifhihnrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkhgvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhl rdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 720F914C00BD; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:59:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-128-gd51a832-fm-20200728.001-gd51a8328 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <964fa1d6-e1a3-4bff-84d7-55afb770b69c@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <09A85EDCA3E8E51C5F8B50C45CED3B08@gmail.com> References: <09A85EDCA3E8E51C5F8B50C45CED3B08@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:59:27 +0100 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] inferno Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: anonymous standard CMS frontend On Fri, Jul 31, 2020, at 8:06 AM, thinktankworkspaces@gmail.com wrote: > I heard mention of inferno in a few posts. Does anyone here still use > that? If so why? I'm interested in seeing what it looks like dare i say > on top of 9front? inferno looks and behaves the same on any system, plan 9 or other, that's what most attracted me to it. i stopped trying to use it when i switched to amd64 9front. at the time, it couldn't run on it. i don't know if it's been fixed. most of the inferno fans who were developing for it abandoned it when go came out. more recently, bhgv ported it to inferno and made a bunch of other improvements, but i don't think he ran it on plan 9. http://vitanuova.com/ links inferno's list also: http://www.caerwyn.com/ there's more in inferno list archives.