From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from cmo-0001.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.170]) by ewsd; Sat Oct 17 01:52:33 -0400 2020
Received: from cmr-0002.xspmail.jp ([202.238.198.119])
	by cmo with ESMTP
	id TeylkUjAdL3UqTf8pkx0LC; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:52:31 +0900
Received: from pi3.jitaku.localdomain ([180.146.253.22])
	by cmr with ESMTPA
	id Tf8okePjxXCwUTf8okaZdZ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:52:31 +0900
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	s=x01; t=1602913951; i=kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp;
	bh=RZok5a170QI1rr6JDn/TRAtHIqJnna/op19Qbc4QBZM=;
	h=To:Subject:Date:From:In-Reply-To;
	b=0+SHJI7eaXoPElYDM5khQrJ7qCfkX8K9dtt9jC7SnhPzZVyvlr4ezyG1ZYSRSErTl
	 IwXjKOQ4yWXzgEPQgOZHdQPvlcYl5iAHL1SHs1db+YWfvIO8d3r3B6wt5wnL27Y1rt
	 M+E4XrNISJvD5mZAS2vvc5K+KR8HVaOpo17jqaAneSEa0KNX+F+/CUZjpO+1arC5WI
	 AhyCGsW/t2yG2Ppo2WDwNgtKTBrowX/Kj/isUTW0H5VrHPMti4NcjVF+j3JSMsMt5f
	 zAb4mzXoGVemxfO7oro5BPHGMiaE0HbPwzdZLHwxLAn1xvuMjxAEpXzq/HFEsUDpWZ
	 skU0ZNJHOKz3g==
Message-ID: <98CF97EA9EF4CE54B5B15D1B7767602B@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] rpi3 wifi
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:52:23 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
In-Reply-To: <55527031659A8AF370A360A24A0ACAEE@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: transactional scale-out property framework 

>> /dev/sdM0/other
>> /dev/sdM0/plan9
>> bootargs is (tcp, tls, il, local!device)[local!/dev/sdM0/fscache] !rc

Ok, I tied this method, and found that it's root is from tls, however,
it runs much slower, and comparable with the vanilla plan9 case.
It's not fine for everyday use.

The method I reported uses local file system, and this does file server's
root file system...

Kenji

PS: I'm writing this mail on terminal above.