From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 16762 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2022 13:52:39 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Aug 2022 13:52:39 -0000
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 09:51:46 -0400 2022
Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-137.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.137])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b6c5a601 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2022 06:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9BAA91F5C6FAC6721688D0F7710FB552@eigenstate.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:51:36 -0400
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <CE8250A802E30C022AA6E0F676E69D2D@9lab.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: scale-out stateless base plugin 
Subject: Re: [9front] dangerous Exit menu item in sub-rio
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth igor@9lab.org:
> 
> Why does `Delete` not apply to a sub-rio, i.e., why does selecting
> `Delete` and then clicking on the gray background of sub-rio not close
> the sub-rio?  That way it would remain a two-step process and there
> is no need to add another menu option.

I think I like that.