From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Tue Sep 22 16:11:54 EDT 2020
Received: from abbatoir.fios-router.home (pool-74-101-2-6.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.101.2.6])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 73ae2fe6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO);
	Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9E1DC0FC2EFF9A9EA7D4B8220CA6403C@eigenstate.org>
To: ori@eigenstate.org, iru.muzgo@gmail.com, 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] Re: vncv(1): support for RFB 3.8
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:11:40 -0700
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <30E43038E10D62CFD2B73EDD106FC287@eigenstate.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: base realtime SSL content-driven-based dependency-aware layer 

>> Hi,
>> 
>> Did anyone try this? kvik?
>> 
> 
> Thanks for pinging -- I haven't tested it yet. Just wondering,
> does this solve any problems, or make any user-visible difference?

To put it another way, what prompted writing the patch?