From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by ewsd; Sat Nov 21 07:49:06 -0500 2020
Message-ID: <9E4114D31751B3A96F7D302A65B2D397@felloff.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:48:53 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] bug: nusb fails to set report protocol with a stall error
In-Reply-To: <26C61BE088AB556C851A08493C15610F@smtp.pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: full-stack map/reduce rails-aware database 

thats a very good catch!

maybe the test should be subclass != 1 instead?  subclass code 1
means the device implements the boot protocol, and therfor supports
the SET_PROTOCOL request. the other values are reserved.

--
cinap