From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4563 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2023 21:15:28 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Oct 2023 21:15:28 -0000
Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 17:14:31 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org;
	s=20200506; t=1698095768;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=WC+4NjGWSnrfBclIjMOyupSZzBbeL+PidCC/vi/gxHc=;
	b=EYYE+X+3ti94TDGIOiGjuLHEPKKPUfnjlXkMQ+nvoU0WPxDvedLDNiFl9LxefxCmHyjv70
	0INo35gex1b+/yeGMjioJq3Dd2hPpLZIMKx8qKZ8/xknEDxg6odAsZJ1f7VrrGDhwBDRtC
	3kVsCK4SDi/bdLBP3Ob/ZNE+rjNwRM8=
Received: from [192.168.168.200] (<unknown> [207.45.82.38])
	by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ee3717ae (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:16:08 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <9d000483-bac2-4716-8658-c566cccade2b@posixcafe.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:14:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <5f50281a-73d8-470f-b629-b691068f10b2@invalid.invalid>
From: Jacob Moody <moody@posixcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <5f50281a-73d8-470f-b629-b691068f10b2@invalid.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: non-blocking secure callback metadata proxy rails-aware method frontend 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/23/23 16:05, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86.

What is the context here? What are you trying to do?