From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2766 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2021 21:17:39 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 22 Apr 2021 21:17:39 -0000 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]) by 1ess; Thu Apr 22 13:54:11 -0400 2021 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A75128FBC for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=V+9NMEVqtOyefHuDcYQiUh4Ro pblqEUfzHvxcZ3SE1w=; b=U0fUchCRTB9pVl9g4IXxAJDFiPy5ngJdvzk9IJtFq 4wUmSN13l4im2cj/hwCMfZ4835WE1+5zh4OlPcDEFbyQgqKl5DDWDu8xcbi8hYog 4+++lpFClJUk/HXbumookM0bxbjEEMo9K/hl3pOeJW1U1fmVT13PXLhdxWvbT5A0 RY= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6E5128FBB for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:50:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Received: from peregrin (unknown [47.34.135.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67D26128FBA for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:50:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:50:24 -0700 From: unobe@cpan.org In-Reply-To: <2FF47E1B41FE0E76BD9988A0963A51E0@felloff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 384980AC-A393-11EB-B0EC-D609E328BF65-09620299!pb-smtp21.pobox.com List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic shader metadata AJAX framework STM layer Subject: Re: [9front] MB Pro early-2011 support status Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth cinap_lenrek@felloff.net: > ah! i just took a look and found this: > > https://fallglow.com/p9/mb/rev/9830eaea57c9 > > this stuff is very hard for us to verify without > having the hardware. > > maybe we should adopt like getting a sysinfo proove > for all pci vid/did additions to at least have a > chance to sanity check it. > > poking at the embedded controller can have fatal > consequences, maybe even brick the machine. Indeed, that was very much my fault, and that's why when I noticed my mistake, I posted a follow-up patch. I see you already fixed it too. Maybe the sysinfo check would be good, or maybe it's just for me--I don't want to inflict more overhead for others due to a problem with a specific person (that is, me). In the future, I'll just make sure to attach sysinfo for any future vid/did additions.