From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22387 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2021 02:19:53 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Jan 2021 02:19:53 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Tue Jan 19 20:51:00 -0500 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([166.175.56.42]) by 5ess; Tue Jan 19 20:51:00 -0500 2021 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:50:58 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: <2A888CF9-DEBE-4DFF-A68D-0EE4086EA8A5@stanleylieber.com> <5AEC3297-201A-46C2-9B80-F5471F80EF26@stanleylieber.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: anonymous extended full-stack descriptor Subject: Re: [9front] user none: cwfs vs hjfs Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On January 19, 2021 8:12:46 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >i can't even do chgrp none file, -- not in group > >On 1/20/21, Silas McCroskey wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 2:05 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>> >>> i was under the impression that cwfs, like hjfs, wrongly allows >>> access=2E do notice that the cat in my example succeeds and prints dat= e=2E >>> it shouldn't IMO=2E >> >> That behavior is correct=2E None has read access because the file is >> world-readable=2E There's nothing wrong in your example=2E >> >> - sam-d >> > yes, file permissions will apply as normal so long as you're not actually = user none=2E the problem i'm describing here is cwfs and hjfs behave differently for us= er none=2E sl