From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lost.goblin@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.108.44 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56bb9902-ec68-4609-9fd6-b15ff57ef411@i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
References: <405d44d0ddf24c71ff94c72804f03bec@gmx.de>
	<6E6A4508-8C98-4CCB-8018-2EBB2BAE043A@fastmail.fm>
	<AANLkTikvqCyMdbnn2F9v0+k6HxzLXzMEedSeMDY1uZBc@mail.gmail.com>
	<56bb9902-ec68-4609-9fd6-b15ff57ef411@i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:04:18 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7UZ9FDZRMjlcxqnLijw0eKRd0Qc
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=x_WhkmQbxD9Fd6a8p3REieek_J7tcv_n8um2J@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: todo
From: Uriel <uriel@berlinblue.org>
To: 9front@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:40 PM, aiju <aiju@phicode.de> wrote:
>
>> This is plain gratuitous idiotic protocol breaking, you can do the
>> same thing simply by providing an alternative attach name with ctl
>> file(s) for fancy things like moving stuff around.
>
> It doesn't break the protocol at all: Clients which don't need it
> don't have to know about it and if the server doesn't have it the
> client can emulate it.

But then the client has to negotiate with the server to find out if it
supports the Tmove extension,
it is totally idiotic and retarded, adding it via an alternative
attach name is trivial and doesn't break any shit.

uriel