From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lost.goblin@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.153.68 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 02:30:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:30:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vUuPycAw-UjvibsSyOtDck90AvQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: default font etc. From: Uriel To: 9front@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303bf9b455b1df04a621643c --20cf303bf9b455b1df04a621643c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This topic is a bikeshed minefield. The only real issue with the default fonts is the license. uriel On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Andreas Wagner wrote: > Hello 9front, I think some tweaking of the aesthetics would be a > superficial but large improvement. I suggest starting by changing to a > cleaner default font (maybe vera?) > > - Andreas Wagner > --20cf303bf9b455b1df04a621643c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This topic is a bikeshed minefield.

The only = real issue with the default fonts is the license.

= uriel

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:26 PM, An= dreas Wagner <andreasbwagner@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello 9front, I think some tweaking of the = aesthetics would be a
superficial but large improvement. I suggest starting by changing to a
cleaner default font (maybe vera?)

- Andreas Wagner

--20cf303bf9b455b1df04a621643c--