From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outgoing.selfhost.de ([82.98.82.6]) by ewsd; Mon Feb 3 04:12:33 EST 2020 Received: (qmail 27687 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2020 09:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx03.bss-wf.de) (postmaster@emdtgvmf.mail.selfhost.de@84.150.47.200) by mailout.selfhost.de with ESMTPA; 3 Feb 2020 09:12:16 -0000 Received: by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7FDED3DDC5; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 10:12:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from 9nbW.pala (p4FD3F2D5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.211.242.213]) by mx03.bss-wf.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6183DDA4 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 10:12:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] upas/fs plumb modify for self-made flag changes Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 10:12:03 +0100 From: theinicke@bss-wf.de In-Reply-To: <7217BD625086D47AA842D31975A43E5D@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: open-source agile core grid Thanks for your reply and sorry for the noise related to not inlining the patch. > This is probably the right thing to do. Glad to hear this. > Acme Mail both modifies messages and watches for modification > notifications. Have you made sure sure that it does the right > thing in all cases? I have tested it; even with multiple acme Mail instances running at the same time, it did the right thing for all the cases I have tried. Having this in my tree for more than a week and using acme Mail as my daily driver I am fairly confident, that this does not introduce any regression. -- Tobias Heinicke