From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17055 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2023 02:39:25 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Jul 2023 02:39:25 -0000 Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Fri Jul 7 22:38:09 -0400 2023 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 22:38:09 -0400 From: sl@stanleylieber.com To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: NoSQL replication YAML descriptor just-in-time controller Subject: Re: [9front] Free Carrots #6: Tools For Fighting WiFi Inequality Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > i'm 99% sure it's coincidence, the pcie version or connector shape > shouldn't matter. i can now verify this empirically: Update 2023.07.07: I told an inadvertent lie above, claiming that no M.2 cards are fast in 9front. In fact, the Intel 6235 is an M.2 NGFF card, and it works great. Years ago I had recorded this fact[0] after installing one in my ThinkPad T431s, and then we even bragged about it[1] in the body of a 9front release announcement. At some point I forgot it existed. One day, after writing the original version of this post, I was perusing old sysinfo entries and re-noticed the designation. I acquired another example, installed it in my ThinkPad X1 Yoga 3rd Gen, and it performs similar to the mPCIE cards examined above. That is to say, exhibiting much faster throughput than any opther M.2 card I've tried. So far, I've failed to find any other Intel M.2 cards prior to the 7260. sl [0] http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/hardware/thinkpad/t431s/20aa-000bus/sysinfo [1] http://9front.org/releases/2017/02/21/0/