From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 3645 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2021 01:16:13 -0000
Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 31 Dec 2021 01:16:13 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 4ess; Thu Dec 30 20:07:47 -0500 2021
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1640912858;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=3FXyAJOOTZLE9m7VxaOn72XAVrHfvvDixCQU752QGB0=;
	b=ryAhZ2O6Rkb+5Q0DTGcFAYGUUHnuP+LRwMWtpXeYd8ep83UqR4VYMcWT6mgM9lFksari3U
	CI4LpqOJmzB3ieLFzvbBip8X3txm1qrQ7N0u7v9dYeLrjx1oqlykHuXQACYU4lcZ2JcX4U
	eUuL8O5kaLPLt51xoguTy1e9353SKxs=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c9773794 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:07:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <C1B4B3B1A41060FE6B214F8B0595F22F@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:09:25 +0200
From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <B898A3370CCC5475FB2E3F4057570468@prosimetrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: open-source advanced callback-scale solution 
Subject: Re: [9front] delete in page(1)
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri Dec 31 02:59:46 +0200 2021, umbraticus@prosimetrum.com wrote:
> Well, that was a good lesson in reading first!
> Dump to the rescue...
> So the feature I assumed this added was just
> removing images from the list, which could
> be handy since I usually have a persistent
> page catching everything plumbed its way.
> I may help myself to just that part of the patch...

Ouch, might not have explained it clearly enough!  That's
easy to do, you could have both since the only part that
changes is basically the remove(2) call.


> Anyway, can confirm it does what it says :)
> Removing the last item in the list did seem
> to break the b3 menu tho...

Ah, that works fine for me.  I'll have to test it some
more then.  Thanks!

qwx