From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 8510 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2022 21:38:55 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 19 Nov 2022 21:38:55 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Sat Nov 19 16:36:05 -0500 2022 Received: from abbatoir (pool-108-27-53-161.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [108.27.53.161]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3b236d16 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:36:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:36:01 -0500 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <632533984.161412.1668888549169@comcenter.netcologne.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: flexible realtime-java extension Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] ethervgbe: add rx checksum offloading Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Arne Meyer : > Is hw offloading something we want? I ask because I think there is something wrong with ether8169 offloading and I'm working on a patch to fix or axe this. > if it makes a real difference in performance and isn't too complex, it may be worth it, but I suspect software is more than fast enough for most of the cards we support.