From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 17699 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2022 02:05:20 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 19 Aug 2022 02:05:20 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 22:03:00 -0400 2022
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1660874518;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=CF0yFmUd6Wk7T2CFbZDP1yqPQNySp+FF8g2bRcuW80s=;
	b=jIpyNoc56NFgjtk2CvQTSLJSCO25yS5b6CP3VXRBwzQxCAAevqFd+UJetfcAuVEV1xnYxq
	WPxuSDbpmWtJHCtmj1YGrjXy5BFus/nl52gUUWdyfw62eh9fz2eD49Au9xeWLPg3SaF8sm
	gpkdV6TMbWVc8HhPny5DELy6AYdDlxE=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e89ab600 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <C3B69925CCEA9BA200C7A58CCC6DE24F@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 04:02:54 +0200
From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <Yv7tRPQJayjspyng@wopr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: progressive agile markup deep-learning controller 
Subject: Re: [9front] hackathon writeup
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

> The X230 line in the sand is one we hashed out in IRC back when there
> was much confusion regarding which SKUs Intel blessed with which
> features at which times.  There might be the odd *20-series or older
> machine that managed to get a 'good' processor, but the X230 is the
> first generation that *for sure* has the features.  The further back in
> time you go, the more of a crap shoot it is.  I tend to just claim X230
> as the earliest as it greatly simplifies the issue.

I see, that's what confused me.  Thanks!

Cheers,
qwx