From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 30327 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2023 21:07:50 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Nov 2023 21:07:50 -0000 Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by 9front; Sat Nov 25 16:05:18 -0500 2023 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:05:09 +0100 From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <1375031432.2686734.1700936861177@comcenter.netcologne.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtual firewall core locator Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] ipv6 flow label support Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk ok, just read the rfc... i suppose we should probably calculate the flowhash when we establish the connection and know the 5-tuple instead of doing that hash for every single packet being sent out. special case is udp, which can work in headers mode. -- cinap