From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20830 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 04:12:16 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 04:12:16 -0000 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]) by 9front; Tue Oct 24 00:03:50 -0400 2023 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407C11C311F for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:03:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=+Nis63wnHoJg1LQ/kE7o5Tuxq rXwiURlOmNYoE1h0GQ=; b=EMWO1AZno9NHLsVzgauTmnIGrBbVH8nGtmIlootGB seeHOFLtDtYVsYhTaDBJeHapWhxzD2zlFzGzfW+RP3DuZgvC02ervpBuSHUXfJXF o/V9+igfFJa3MIJZFMUPADkozXJ9ZcQbyZK2u8N4A6YYfhJoMGC7psnvUU5NUM65 4c= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809F1C311E for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:03:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Received: from strider.localdomain (unknown [24.205.13.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BEB91C311D for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:03:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 21:03:47 -0700 From: unobe@cpan.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 55AC020E-7222-11EE-872F-78DCEB2EC81B-09620299!pb-smtp1.pobox.com List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: database HTTP general-purpose dependency manager Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Blue-Maned_Hawk : > On 10/23/23 23:37, Kurt H Maier wrote: > 'Tisn't but m'dialect, man. More like an idiolect (that's a technical term, related etymologically to idiot and idiosyncrasy). We all of them. But the way you're writing now compared to your initial writing makes me think you're just digging in heels, feeling attacked. If you want some help with the 0x86, you can follow the advice Ori posted. Give more context.