From: ori@eigenstate.org
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: upas ntlm auth -- untested, unused?
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 23:28:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C98E2E65F86F8C97C4C594DC15595402@eigenstate.org> (raw)
The upas ntlm auth code has a comment claiming it's untested.
I don't have an imap server that does ntlm. Is anyone is using
the upas ntlm auth? Does anyone have access to an imap server
that does ntlm?
I'd like to remove either the code or the comment.
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 7:28 ori [this message]
2019-12-11 12:22 ` [9front] " Steve Simon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C98E2E65F86F8C97C4C594DC15595402@eigenstate.org \
--to=ori@eigenstate.org \
--cc=9front@9front.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).