From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17772 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2021 16:23:11 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Jul 2021 16:23:11 -0000 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]) by 1ess; Tue Jul 13 12:16:55 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d12so20138421pfj.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0UXmFH59nYvuUgPvw/bPROUvunbEX4W00RUXR/YrpFQ=; b=Z/6fpcKNCketK8E+btzfbmGv7JO+1QlRgtObO3HBhmk2f0CWoXGbMvl+yZeEuK68fW KIZmFn2zkcVMEwO8xYV6rdQrgdKZ0hiVWZJr67vVJvpAnd4YGTwsvoObiaj+1OitTABc UzV5+1FLJz7QD6kHvx4tqM7Ne4DZep7et0+vZuSgZcy3TFVgYWnu/Do7qJFEF2mQa5g6 QZU8W7A9ypVk78n7d1Mc/40neAgE4QOCnq2qF2OWgOBsFaVUqPVj8PAU3RpBypFdgEvl u0JAyFxT0U+h6PUGrV98nQsjKTFqOHigv1c0XEstZQP7s+UMi2ZU/xssjOBaEVQ8fEe0 eVlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0UXmFH59nYvuUgPvw/bPROUvunbEX4W00RUXR/YrpFQ=; b=JsnUb10EbMICElQaB1KyeAQ1BikqWJLNMdp3Cb+hkbhbEyfp97xPuJb1dg9pEuFylH oc4AYwJToNWbYE5n4seZ5C8uescyjUeAwC4XPoITvyv1Js9GbPCsqmhAcFMb8IGZYqA+ hDiLC+Z3RbvvLtzfTm+lE/LkI1BV5sNRCoN77uuQPQ0FujIqfkVLDqD5+lEM3B59vdi5 ftwseEqxWYdrTJRd38gU4J8SBUzTM0hphZ40dkplZRqcdt0exuCo0aXmjg8MtDl2auLR +SNRlH/0+7p5LWAKwrYm0xjKpATpPyKhzOBpfJIqycdPvapwNJnZEWLTLeX1OWYLMqlQ 195g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531h7BVvdS7GXJ4xMWkFjtIytb3sj07imt84Z5nB4W0HSZS/xo9k hn1geMiGAGbDG688DdQSuhUpSzyVcofOeXNSDYAnOmnz X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbEI2QnV8+gQ/QhccWRkRrmKT8idU2JnBsIRX6lH2n9BT80MLRaHUWiH6Chc6H2S7/BavY8gKUGqYMhgK1cUw= X-Received: by 2002:a65:6253:: with SMTP id q19mr4980583pgv.230.1626193007841; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8CE29EA89CBA8F74C1D4D8EEF2528473@eigenstate.org> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgTWlndWVsIFPDoW5jaGV6IEdhcmPDrWE=?= Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: proven injection ActivityPub over XMPP engine-oriented replication Subject: Re: [9front] Mouse clipping patch Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Innermost-focused rio gets the control, with a key for "giving up" the focus (going then a "level" up in the stack) is what i propose. On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:14 PM Stuart Morrow wrote: > > On 13/07/2021, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > > no, that is never a problem as rio forwards the keyboard commands to > > the relevant selected subprocess (scrollock, DEL and ESC keys for > > example). > > How about keyboard-based resizing, deleting, etc that some people seem > to want? Which rio do *those* commands go to? How do you decide? You > can't just give up being able to close any window where cons is set to > raw - most of the time it *won't* be a subrio.