From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 17838 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2021 21:29:55 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Jul 2021 21:29:55 -0000
Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]) by 1ess; Tue Jul 13 14:29:44 -0400 2021
Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id v14so4582489plg.9
        for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=S4vc92umRklQYkTlgaxVEdA5bZ1Xr8X0Nz3zOWUpkG8=;
        b=GUQ9FPXy+nIYknHmEwmvgAjEPlJl99Md0TpfRMTkwdQPSIhATd8tagYbcvASZheJMH
         jWzWEB1IG94niAygoo+fwOtYOpyYX/Sg6iMz4hzxhpllGGvc7C6LA5x5IYPEwbDjGzOs
         WotCmYJmNeg5ItPItlDlGYsPQskv8pjclEwuAm7tqzHWmD6GvEFZ59jWV30kwuVp9IGb
         UAE691jMLFllKhMV3KCvHdarrNKo85hPqAuwwoxk7efSy4Fq1YyJGRvBXXCrv2/I84ZT
         DT6bgEcqzlNgG1S+WUt/E2EPloDysLiYY19zQV/0SUIg6v9xNvyhKKzKmmvjbBaE9WMZ
         5kkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=S4vc92umRklQYkTlgaxVEdA5bZ1Xr8X0Nz3zOWUpkG8=;
        b=PRPqvVlawEbeBtlOSlyihXZm1ut+L2VzXgQz5f7XHNRnpX2pL7nitdzfJUccfsenFQ
         J2uK0zcRwYZ0WNJibIDmWctYxFj3ihMsUOkbILtycNbH6phd0pHXIdmyhxfCDfIqCjtc
         1ABKCFpjLW80d09dZ8so2sRdggffCA1VanKivaXUOt4AGQYURf24cFseRIBNHhYCYtmM
         1TNttpQgpiQSKOt1X/BD/OHnO5emMOlahm2uYzIYwzQgGGLG0IMkeFECj6RK/mwCluoq
         VALkuDAD5G7o9TXc9u6IHStugbvEowpE+XywhVOTdwRwLxDm6z28vwRGPQBPYm/ZIxVp
         b2Ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hy3M0tSluklVxyTvdWctNuwDuXeA0GeNDrMsnPhgq2IkZ4dAb
	/UwKEr1cM+Yu25sO9wq8mw3Ii8r2G4gROauJfGODtb/5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxgyUlgknpkNZbDCFPD7h19lOGOlAS8dCt1iiLUXOZt0C4nKAkE7VZrXBninMKYwaBBuZcdw76vwgdilPeYMk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2dce:: with SMTP id q14mr5487030pjm.42.1626200977502;
 Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA85C879ggSM=fPu+CcgToakbhMh2Rk=A5gn3AWsPUqUYGFckQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8CE29EA89CBA8F74C1D4D8EEF2528473@eigenstate.org> <CAA85C87qdQe6Bj6E4XvGwgOd7_cgQOJ4Yiv8tRhL4pEzzMTqQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFSF3XPsOK5f2-5s1ZG=nSEP+ejng+vLfZZ+J_iX=RuTTpoYjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA85C84DWyYoo-y4-errRfwvgFyktO+faRGhA6JdMunwOfvWCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABB-WO9KD40paOd-hnHsqGoq_0=6s4uoW_xmXJNwd15Zx5Yhvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFSF3XPhDeKiKXdsL0Abnderm45Uc2GCPYsi6ygSaBkf7gDBmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABB-WO-8SKMGmQ84QCM8gGdgVP0L-PERGDgb_rGJqg-DQPM=XA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA85C84DU76Hz2n+jYDZEKwfawbTEADyhKMZ-72tSm5SbZWpqQ@mail.gmail.com> <31017285-5870-4BF4-96E5-EDC5E307F6FF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <31017285-5870-4BF4-96E5-EDC5E307F6FF@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgTWlndWVsIFPDoW5jaGV6IEdhcmPDrWE=?= <soy.jmi2k@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 20:29:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA85C87irDNoXDH2h=kUdzGUPhP=k=S=sV-EkdUaAK=_Ed0qXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: extended rich-client scripting descriptor cache 
Subject: Re: [9front] Mouse clipping patch
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

That's actually true, if I want that key to both unfocus a window and
unfocus rio if there is no focused window. It would require special
treatment for rio windows... Back to the drawing board...


On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 7:47 PM Xiao-Yong Jin <meta.jxy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Jos=C3=A9 Miguel S=C3=A1nchez Garc=C3=ADa=
 <soy.jmi2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Innermost-focused rio gets the control, with a key for "giving up" the
> > focus (going then a "level" up in the stack) is what i propose.
>
> Now you are breaking the fourth wall and making rio aware that there
> may (or may not?) be another world outside it.  By default rio
> passes input down to its children, after breaking this fourth wall,
> rio has to process the input somehow and determine if it wants to
> "give up" the focus to its parent.  What if its child that has the
> focus is a rio?  How does it know how many of its descendent rios
> have "given up"?