From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 3023 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2021 14:10:01 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Jul 2021 14:10:01 -0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com ([209.85.208.44]) by 1ess; Tue Jul 13 10:03:52 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ca14so16430856edb.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 07:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2x36H0q5gDecFvbh9/yyvU+bsBXZgyZOi0ak4rIb8+o=; b=OnjtVwYKz+Dg6cyXbPCO0F252aOeyIsEbyASkY56PXpxwn7yG4ZbApkJUrtGAPR5wW rLKxQrIIsGlE+Yf/ar3ZMwLuaQKj+s5UjrKNeMIeXQJWI/Mubxx61KMMsIZCZJswtxwe 4r5cIgEJLXDbBLd4giJrwbfa1KfXqRyTFJa5/UQQB2+5oNSFWy2VLSpH+F33/JpG1aeN wzZuN/jn1q63kSEVCHxWe3ckERGY8g8ckX8Yf4mnmi2NHz649w95TLTgc8gJ+sH2Saq1 o3LdCwNmKJJii0vR7beqm8nZRkv1z1ueaL/L2eN/pD4w5aqu7VioKInPbd6HTbSfRwdN LN2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2x36H0q5gDecFvbh9/yyvU+bsBXZgyZOi0ak4rIb8+o=; b=qlx4qacdw084mq42LKNda217TAHT81UIKSXtzQGVedWidhGWx0r4Igk2jin2nQLUrZ cR9SWZVnZ3ktuPSYlA/N7OmyvV31zZC1E51+0l/BvY0MJRBWwFfXqi/KY9fRHI4O5l3G pgx20MSL0RIFag8CuFQlRJlsZpItj8rF2OvX6Qcp2MTm7CdZ9nnLQhL0kwjSgP3sveDV 8Jk5c3Ie0mA65BRRFt5QknYstbiUbcuicBMj1u/p6j5Omk0pPfmI2NnpGLsJ+GDUlxoM 97Wx1CU1kIa04BSPvtz2bAlmdoOnpoDJ8ULeLN1ERmQvhT385cpZ0EVlpfl+bLqct0CH dEIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532H/b5ZEm08mz2Qb28WwDg1O2sFJM7AYWasVG7lrOCk9IqAFc1P +RHWRrfswEgRbTCeKXtoIidkakCMbVJSHfXc6DS30Nj3orw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXWzxMEv0ICDi2mAO76jXzqMFWezAMwgAiY4Gk4Eq1H9vFuEv0Q9kLdvJGdjLRDfPb04Yq++BIpHQa8my72Mw= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d809:: with SMTP id v9mr6102277edq.146.1626185025065; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 07:03:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:76c8:b029:4d9:7711:78cc with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <23937AA2E442EF4F276AF2CCD3AC7DCA@eigenstate.org> References: <8CE29EA89CBA8F74C1D4D8EEF2528473@eigenstate.org> <23937AA2E442EF4F276AF2CCD3AC7DCA@eigenstate.org> From: Stuart Morrow Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:03:44 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: software-aware plugin property property-based layer Subject: Re: [9front] Mouse clipping patch Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > But also, do we need to do it? Is there any case > where we want to constrain the grab to anything > other than the whole window? What if the ctl > messages were just > > trap > release > > with no further parameters? > > Also: in addition to dropping rect parsing and > validation, we can keep the clip across resizes, > since there's no ambiguity around where it should > go: the client has no choice. Nice idea, but on the Blit dragging the scrollbar with button 2 constrained the mouse (to the scroll bar). I don't really care.