From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 30308 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2021 22:13:45 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Jul 2021 22:13:45 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by 1ess; Thu Jul 15 17:47:47 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id c17so11694450ejk.13 for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:47:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3BTzcL8kPLqztiByfAJuaVkxkE8DRsEN/mHsyQGGyh8=; b=mVrbGMLxaDTWU08CyfMGR3dpinA6IymF332BUbSSfUSmpPJxKW5EoPIXHYSGfRzYmg 2FdW4N2om1X8/3Cwsi7iYtuvwriXo7uBRrB77nLTXgYMzrbyX8X9kJmUW01c+/5pujVw 6yA5qAkVW+NxVIMov3j/1LrfjDB9Lt/bfsj6429EsU+CYYhWrGTXQN6YpCYYpaEl8ngc nMgE0kNFlDSkERHo6GPwtXsMsVi8vA5Ky+il2YV+T1Z85mDP9Jln/b1IRGDs4PkgK4Pt 3SGfa6RiYyXg7199pN1NzJHi9JFF7INA6HgVLqrssxGeszCJLwM8KdedeQmpvonEeKp3 MW/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3BTzcL8kPLqztiByfAJuaVkxkE8DRsEN/mHsyQGGyh8=; b=sSntvW/2WMXnzluN+NMFcLpABC7ylOqW9O2Zr8cEZwGMyoF5rxXU4uDNqh9z+vxda6 n9oG6kZnuOBd5cqXsSfKWJThrXN6G3ny2zVVsTLeafDKQB09roVYZjTH8J6eDNm8Pd3p 5tolx6YEGx3Fkl0AmaHdYbH+M9W+CLmY9P5qL1BU9+kil9QAkN1JdoFZ4BcohimWqrvN Dgj6yXjw3AdGRTc3M8xO7lnxuJRJ4o9gC/vovYMgJocL/9J8QhL3kPvF5nD4QbqFM6nY vcgD5UcC9Dhii0fDPTdRqfilHDzLZkoE7WViEMRAlFQ+waI3kwvkamZT4DcKo3Tc+T8b 7SWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532453Z45iSjzdN/dlA3ZafBQhRk5oRDk1SfaG5I9xkp7bZWtrb/ 2kKnB0w5NfX8iYAlJ35RzauqPnWOn+RtJgq7yQNr3ehvB8c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpTAlzeVtkudg/eK/peCPpXI2qDLQCU/MytQ3EpmSkfmqnyro5vHEy8tMQJxe4t7ua9CTaK54G3rFrhrpxtXQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7708:: with SMTP id kw8mr8040730ejc.111.1626385658808; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:47:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:76c8:b029:4d9:7711:78cc with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:47:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Stuart Morrow Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:47:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: XML over ActivityPub standard-oriented hypervisor deep-learning database Subject: [9front] Re: speaking of screenlock Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Actually, I don't get what it is about screenlock in the first place that different procs can't access each other's malloc'd objects. It seems other programs can do this just fine.