From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2CF24382 for ; Sun, 19 May 2024 23:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yw1-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]) by 9front; Sun May 19 17:05:51 -0400 2024 Received: by mail-yw1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-61816fc256dso17787537b3.0 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 19 May 2024 14:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716152750; x=1716757550; darn=9front.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aaen08Q6a3128fVZD0cswVHSUpRrkvUniaimzzOXqe4=; b=OsJC4fZ97ysIHXML5Knii6Xnn1RzlWdYVrQ4sPV8j0SLDSjwKcKZJjQPF+y17ONilx ZpqCOabktt4Yi7rooqv67aL3V4dF7U1QkYYinoYoSFOcC5ZrpfFQW1Qee9UWG1xHuGua A2SOzsKQXuPdGIXyiUZWbMgr8PnPq6MHgNYaqKqM/Yew/KJv321430lIXZqZ+MTTh8tD WZBFx7VGgeWglSzJ26akCca58YLbGKGkidWRHeOMb4CB6/1X9nufEkz2FWqpvnDbcTKt /bYwNcbsqLF2HOthFiKXHx4rti5Pgg9br1Ifm7bbDL1ZYqwxU2NYT2tdlYdfBsPE+Jri YP1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716152750; x=1716757550; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aaen08Q6a3128fVZD0cswVHSUpRrkvUniaimzzOXqe4=; b=lfdsgXKAh2YUBxJM943s4bt1iORftaUBwQ+YTOSEk8z4TLl32CFZBNy7J4piFGV7PE 8273QgxBwXbKCAUtHFmAHUU2yWAmYMAWT7d/UkCprtavxn4nrwC3ih/hZv+oeY/s8wGi fzyUypXkWDMVpIzpJ7/0vsWCLN5vTS/ZgcxIWcZNM/S0icx+U/I2jWTzLKtcP9KbJpOG fXWn/tZB/RF5viOOKEzZbdGSJloVNBglH90HlClfpXxzILJfryYPn+VDO4diQY3P2S6i y58mNC7FvRDe41JbRGz1MeJGmCpycVkvKtWKwUWGR/sBX++Dq7DGCZnyY8nInFuLQznh GSkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0qAusOzP8aQpWXm/9SFEY6YaGDmIx4aPPwQgMoyD7PbzV5jpZ I3+PJpwkrP3L+FwPSfRsbtiDvi2IJ37P0u5JJY5WGmCTemU5fJ0dlcvJTllFf/uimXzTXnRdAFZ GeTATZDCuuH6dlhDsHvkCuT/0CGULBiYC X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuNNGnbhNMG71A9uo+SwNKtP44SNvPlEhuMxNKLzuEdE2mHPL4cBy9wzlV1MBy21B6np2InXrW27QNTfsj3Eo= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8382:0:b0:de5:5067:6b4a with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dee50a695a2mr24256723276.2.1716152750394; Sun, 19 May 2024 14:05:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Stuart Morrow Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 22:05:39 +0100 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: cache-scale API module Subject: Re: [9front] 5e Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Ah. I understand this distinction. ?i is the type of emulation used for like, shellcode analysis by security people. Also, if I had read the man pages first I wouldn't have had to ask. One thing I've just learned is there is actually such a program as 5i. The existence of both for the same cputype instantly suggests two different uses, instead of the newest interpreter just having the wrong name. One last random observation: > BUGS > The code generated by the compilers is well supported, but > some unusual instructions are unimplemented. Some Plan 9 Qemu-386 actually can't run 9vx. It creates a window and then dies at the point where vx32 starts doing stuff.