From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19685 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2021 19:41:55 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Jul 2021 19:41:55 -0000 Received: from mail-oo1-f48.google.com ([209.85.161.48]) by 1ess; Thu Jul 1 15:12:35 -0400 2021 Received: by mail-oo1-f48.google.com with SMTP id b17-20020a4aba110000b029024c219a3d83so1842101oop.10 for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:12:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjFS1pialdF+iebFMMzMQBmpfDza+X9ZC4dktikBC0Q=; b=dDn4ZhL5MUsgR7TmImquBx8+YprmthS5cdDik48OVUJz3NrDX0jtDMxMsEUtdoKI4Q BChe9L7pMVpsWmltYOOkwNMbBmiNOxbL5JWNOf01wQNzm/x5AQXig8umIe9O6bRinFkT uFpWXsT2HzoTuYkjF+1BhUQ+ni/vnnKhIITHK/TyeYngPxEzspFrY33KHmEGOB3w+Jii y7EQeH2YgCwC7/jDW79AawKy/dgDTx9+gENi5X0HFOTH1EhloViOG6VQVREFsaMBbzn5 XTByZ3PnPrAh2qwol4c4S0RKCQ/iOfnKlT4UK2Wvp+YtB+V28aw1APRWLObdvdytWSCV QGTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RjFS1pialdF+iebFMMzMQBmpfDza+X9ZC4dktikBC0Q=; b=DFwjFsyCIMxieW10VNqzq6yoeJnITso42Eh/Kh5U4V/zK241kTaSBq1poGJa7H26iD SK+Ute1oZdCn7SEsk2ahWwGf3uhxzS7aAlu2c8ndQbA0iDpybk9MeNfdCZO8v9ym1ax3 o9Hfxbr8cfzSg2Kuq1QYXQjAnvHbbQZi+zeU9ynys03EMsbfN5eYc41RDk5uJJDnImmu kKosvVwe98dt3T1ZcgIERw7KB3mOQ3oaBqS4JzZbRGuUxRElwm8QL3+NV86wvhOhV8dQ v5IuQw6fP2c/JzNhTUwlGQnmWtHQukoxQVXqDihR96gsGqOK2ySn4JQ8v4AaP1DFB/ey 6ACw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PcUzyFSpvgjS4tSfKccJeS47KT7EDQCEG6uP6Rt5pf6045c+n sQwEI5timd6msdHMIGJzMnea01dMuDawltSCVlYlZQcRoJw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlXY1sUIFfguHH3xMHDq3lSjINIwPbPXrTiWiv/pIn+BrMcwPU3BsVlloGflsOyRoqvZWRs+Or22us4tnyQkM= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:1a84:: with SMTP id 126mr1120358oof.77.1625166745191; Thu, 01 Jul 2021 12:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac9:410a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:12:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: kemal Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 19:12:24 +0000 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: table storage-aware TOR over ActivityPub dependency app locator Subject: Re: [9front] Ralink RT3090 driver Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk 2021-07-01 16:08 GMT, Jos=C3=A9 Miguel S=C3=A1nchez Garc=C3=ADa : > Hello everyone, > > My laptop has a Ralink RT3090 Wi-Fi card, which I couldn't get > working. However, the FQA marks it as working (section 3.2.3.2.3 and > sysinfo of sl's X60s in section 3.2.5.2.1). Can somebody check if > that's true? > > If the FQA is wrong, kemal has been working on the attached patch for > that card. It mostly works, but under heavy load it disconnects > (ip/ping -n 100000 -i 10 will fail at some point) and we couldn't > figure it out. Testing would be greatly appreciated! > > Cheers, > jmi2k > some fixups on this mail: -jmi2k has a rt3290, **NOT** rt3090. the diff adds support for the rt3290 card. the diff also incorporates 802.11g support. -we are wondering if it also crashes on rt3090 and/or rt2790, to see if our changes have a problem or there is something wrong with the driver itself.