From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 14718 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2023 06:13:07 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Jan 2023 06:13:07 -0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]) by 9front; Fri Jan 27 01:11:45 -0500 2023 Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id rl14so11009134ejb.2 for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:11:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=od9TNs5sxD/Me1JbKYsdeaHUsYG80MvVezAIQtlVEgc=; b=R9C16y+RpkB5LBKr1HoO3Slpc57tKGr1TIovvuV1VtjcGeTqlGykOmfQ1iIvQ3Zq17 dKPAI5PNYvKgNMRUNWguezUVMOvEGJu2MjDGEM4o+s9tNy2QY0A5UwsiTBTXc1GTA9X4 +ykNQ3NAJmP89rDapqUt5Cp9ysd6nzlR6tUneBe1CKwBl0KFXqu5AF4fG1Rc83STKFG4 L2/y18mbslUFTOiFuM4eMjxa4JfVxTqYcXxAiVXwe2vGAUjs2WtBS+uDd6MAjWMx6xFR 3SlrMR2AQL+6tfTXmtpcJQttYAeDSIpJcTsXVVQrfHQHNRHMpquhzvEURctbjSZ5n0N1 VuRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=od9TNs5sxD/Me1JbKYsdeaHUsYG80MvVezAIQtlVEgc=; b=h3XZb2aHBwzARUZ/SKV6owNPo4iQX2mU5FSN8tN9vE9v3ZyT+vlpYgiEDqJxDcHfvU uA/aHR/EW79AlvZqjnO+lTlQyMCVZeucbieSyjSW7XBUErQnJX0CSCOy3sIa4eD3ikfK R+y6wogu80mxFDtK7WrnSYc4jiZQpTJePYoVh31cBzUJpslKDxiZ9Yu2lsgYreKnQk7c yb+VdRSp5L6G2nX5mh4Mfwjz3EzJuEdw496sJoId+2MNpbMRtcorpywF68D6yjURg4Bw /F+3Mt4fdhDw0DC6q1bnGXDyX3gO13S4GhvxUC9zZrgzsFiLw1hGscuvN1M071z7ueYM 7opw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqz/VtEasrYXYn7YQ1tWLHFY1pNWhdyvxqBmz6lO8muhA4QdsqM bDoHbpaiqMNj5E9dZrUvzrYzeHjm0HB20T2bT7u4rg9N X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtH1iBzdRVZ2RYYGYDLkBeid6FJ/ftPAaL1eVlqGrT9OKr4PXAN7X/Bd4o2xN8ozVkbPfqC0qvHLRoJn4ex1mg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f181:b0:870:1090:66d1 with SMTP id gs1-20020a170906f18100b00870109066d1mr4747930ejb.242.1674799898860; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:11:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:7208:6491:b0:62:6fa5:14f3 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:11:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <87988F72F1C2D20B16DE8DA47FB8C262@alice> From: kemal Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 06:11:37 +0000 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: content-addressed replication hardware engine-oriented control Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] libsec: add minimal support for the tls renegotiation extension Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk 2023-01-26 21:52 GMT, Frank D. Engel, Jr. : > Most common web browsers and many servers have dropped support for > anything older than 1.2, so pretending to be 1.1 is not likely to be > useful regardless. correct. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8996 /lib/rfc/rfc8996 2023-01-26 20:54 GMT, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>: > i'm not sure what you're saying there. i think you don't understand > the basics behind what a downgrade even is. > > me, i'm missing out on the details what the common clients out there > demand to find as a minimum version. > i'm sorry, but i'm also not sure about what you're saying. why are you asking this question?