I'd like to submit a patch:

```

diff 0e66f87316e571f7edf5274369ec69a5905507aa uncommitted
--- a/sys/src/9/bcm/devgpio.c
+++ b/sys/src/9/bcm/devgpio.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
 
 static char *bcmtableR2[PIN_TABLE_SIZE] = {
  0, 0, "2", "3", // 0-3
- "4", 0, 0, "7", // 4-7
+ "4", "5", "6", "7", // 4-7
  "8", "9", "10", "11", // 8-11
  0, 0, "14", "15", // 12-15
  0, "17", "18", 0, // 16-19

```

Per the patch submission docs here:
Explain the problem that your change solves. Explain why your change solves the problem well.

The problem is that when using 9front on an Rpi3/Rpi4, on a revision 2 board, in bcm scheme, you cannot use GPIO5 nor GPIO6. If you look at the pinout, https://pinout.xyz/pinout/, you can see GPIO5 and GPIO6 are both GPIO pins - so, you should be able to use them. As you can see in the patch, "5" and "6" were both missing from the bcmtableR2 definition. The changes noted above fix this issue by adding GPIO5  ("5") and GPIO6 ("6") to the bcmtableR2 definition. I specifically only addressed r2 boards b/c I don't have an r1 board and don't want to make any speculations.
 
If applicable, explain how you tested the patch, and give us a way of reproducing the issue.

I tested this / you can reproduce this by:
- Trying using GPIO5 and GPIO6 without the patch. You can do this by:
  bind -a '#G' /dev

  cd /dev/gpio
  echo 'scheme bcm' > ctl

  echo 'function out 5' > ctl

  echo 'function out 6' > ctl

  read -c 1 5

  read -c 1 6
- Note that the `read` command above reads '0' from file 5 and from file 6.
- Now try to change the GPIO pins from 0 (off) to 1 (on)
  echo '1' > 5

  echo '1' > 6

Thanks,
Matt