From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.110.2 with SMTP id t2cs187844yhg; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCPG81tSPDBDw_YryBBoEnfaOjQ@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCPG81tSPDBDw_YryBBoEnfaOjQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.223.1.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.223.1.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCPG81tSPDBDw_YryBBoEnfaOjQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.223.1.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCPG81tSPDBDw_YryBBoEnfaOjQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCPG81tSPDBDw_YryBBoEnfaOjQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.223.1.74]) by 10.223.1.74 with SMTP id 10mr6409041fae.39.1312997109525 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wqHYiC8KDvvT8LxoRfYA2Zp3/YK9FsQEgRbhs7t7R4Y=; b=EgVTpcskmPUFbq1ajU2eYdOGBiz1YTUtgdoTcPVY1qt31ZJFVgtVkZ3P5s9jjgv+dN NvGgUXf0N0vnVfVggEEi6Cwb+ax+kX90hKZ60lERSNEt7439Iao1LZON0t1/2npw8xOI mXpS40tPVlTHlG6dGSPomzAjQzP1Lfg5+xDBc= Received: by 10.223.1.74 with SMTP id 10mr2025977fae.39.1312997104545; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.39.211 with SMTP id h19ls945950bke.2.gmail; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.129.24 with SMTP id m24mr188580bks.10.1312997102925; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.129.24 with SMTP id m24mr188579bks.10.1312997102906; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14si554763fac.3.2011.08.10.10.25.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yiyu.jgl@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.54; Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so1521760fxe.41 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.43.1 with SMTP id u1mr11708802fae.38.1312997102742; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.117.6 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110810165019.2f314e40@kolari.ethans.dre.am> References: <46695c2a8a380218741fff083f2efa27@quintile.net> <20110810165019.2f314e40@kolari.ethans.dre.am> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DDE - interesting or horrible? From: yy To: 9front@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: yiyu.jgl@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yiyu.jgl@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yiyu.jgl@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/8/10 Ethan Grammatikidis : > On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:50:49 +0200 > cinap_lenrek@gmx.de wrote: > >> works fine here. maybe its the 24 bit alpha bug? 9front >> has the patches. how does it fail? > > Renders fine here too, labs & 9front. My copy of the labs distro runs > in 9vx. 9front was tried on the hardware (1024x768x32 VESA) and via > cpu(1) from the labs 9vx. Neither system is quite up to date, with the > labs install being a few months old. > The bug depends on the libmemdraw used by the drawing device. As long as you use 9vx to display, you are using 9vx's libmemdraw. Which tree you are using does not matter. The patch was applied in 9vx, but not in the labs' Plan 9. It was submitted by Erik, but it was rejected because the plan was to use p9p's libmemdraw, but that has not happened. See: http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/patch/sorry/memdraw32bit/notes -- - yiyus || JGL .