* [9front] pc64/l.s
@ 2025-02-15 7:10 ron minnich
2025-02-15 14:40 ` Dan Cross
2025-02-15 16:22 ` [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2025-02-15 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
in syscallentry, it does
swapgs
movq gs:0, ax /* m -> */
movq 16(AX), BX
..
movq BX, SP
This is familiar code but a bit different than what I'm used to.
I can't understand it from how Mach is defined: the pointer at offset 16 in
Mach is to Proc.
I've confirmed from qemu that this it is loading Proc, and as far as I'm
concerned that means I don't know what's going on :-)
what am I missing here?
Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 648 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9front] pc64/l.s
2025-02-15 7:10 [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
@ 2025-02-15 14:40 ` Dan Cross
2025-02-15 16:22 ` [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2025-02-15 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 2:17 AM ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> in syscallentry, it does
> swapgs
> movq gs:0, ax /* m -> */
> movq 16(AX), BX
> ..
> movq BX, SP
>
> This is familiar code but a bit different than what I'm used to.
>
> I can't understand it from how Mach is defined: the pointer at offset 16 in Mach is to Proc.
>
> I've confirmed from qemu that this it is loading Proc, and as far as I'm concerned that means I don't know what's going on :-)
>
> what am I missing here?
This is a tad subtle, but the key bit of information is that the
kstack for a proc is right below the proc itself.
It may be useful to look at the entire sequence.
|TEXT syscallentry(SB), 1, $-4
| SWAPGS
Load the kernels GSBASE into GS.
| BYTE $0x65; MOVQ 0, AX /* m-> (MOVQ GS:0x0, AX) */
Move the 64-bit word at offset 0 relative to the GS segment into RAX.
One sees that was set in `mmuinit` in `mmu.c`, and is the address of
the Mach for this processor (`wrmsr(GSBASE,
(uvlong)&machp[m->machno]);`).
| MOVQ 16(AX), BX
Load whatever value is at offset 16 relative to RAX into RBX. The
previous instruction put the address of a `Mach` in RAX; `Mach` is
defined in `/sys/src/9/pc64/dat.h` and there are three data at the
beginning of that struct:
| int machno; // offset 0.
| uintptr splpc; // offset 8, because of alignment
| Proc* proc; // offset 16.
So this loads `proc` into RBX.
| MOVQ SP, R13
Ok, save the old SP that we trapped into the kernel on in a scratch register.
| MOVQ BX, SP
Load the stack pointer with the pointer to `proc` that we loaded
earlier. At first glance, this seems wrong as RBX points to a Proc;
the explanation lies in /sys/src/9/port/proc.c; specifically in
`newproc`. The answer to the mystery is that `Proc` is allocated in a
block that also contains the kstack for that process. Here's the
relevant bit of code:
```
b = malloc(KSTACK+sizeof(Proc));
if(b == nil){
unlock(&procalloc);
return nil;
}
p = (Proc*)(b + KSTACK);
```
So while RBX does indeed point to a proc, right below that is that
proc's kstack, and recall that x86 stacks are full descending. So
this instruction is really loading the stack top into the SP.
| PUSHQ $UDSEL /* old stack segment */
| PUSHQ R13 /* old sp */
| PUSHQ R11 /* old flags */
| PUSHQ $UESEL /* old code segment */
| PUSHQ CX /* old ip */
| PUSHQ $0 /* error code */
| PUSHQ $64 /* trap number
(VectorSYSCALL) */
Push a bunch of state onto the `Proc`'s stack. Note that the first
push (`PUSHQ $UDSEL`) will decrement the SP before storing $UDSEL;
thus, that word will appear just below the start of the `Proc` in
`up`.
| SUBQ $(8 + 23*8-7*8), SP /* arg + sizeof(Ureg)-pushed */
Allocate some space for the `Ureg` that lives at the top of the proc's
kstack when in the kernel.
| MOVQ RMACH, (15*8)(SP) /* old r15 */
| MOVQ RUSER, (14*8)(SP) /* old r14 */
Save the old m/up.
| MOVQ RARG, (7*8)(SP) /* system call number */
Move the system call number into the "argument register" slot in the
Ureg allocated above.
| MOVQ AX, RMACH /* m */
| MOVQ BX, RUSER /* up */
Now we load `m` and `up` with the data we just loaded from the Mach;
RMACH is R15 and RUSER is R14. (The plan 9 compilers know to leave
these alone.)
| LEAQ 8(SP), RARG /* Ureg* arg */
Load the address of the Ureg* we allocated into the argument register;
the plan 9 calling convention takes the first argument in a register
(R8) and the rest of the stack.
| CALL syscall(SB)
Finally, call into C code; `syscall` takes a `Ureg*`, allocated on the
top of the stack. Note that on return from `syscall` the code
immediately proceeds into `forkret`, which resets the kstack state
(dealloc's the Ureg and so on) and goes back to userspace via
`sysret`.
Note that a potential point of confusion is that `Proc`, defined in
`/sys/src/9/port/portdat.h` has the scheduler `Label` as the first
element. `Label` is defined in `sys/src/9/pc64.dat.h` and has two
data, an `sp` and a `pc`. The `sp` comes first in the structure
definition, so one may observe that loading `m->proc` into RBX above
_also_ means that RBX points to the sched stack pointer, but that's
not relevant here.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [9front] Re: pc64/l.s
2025-02-15 7:10 [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
2025-02-15 14:40 ` Dan Cross
@ 2025-02-15 16:22 ` ron minnich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2025-02-15 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9front
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --]
nvm I realized what you were doing as I was falling asleep, it's an
improvement over the original ...
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:10 PM ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> in syscallentry, it does
> swapgs
> movq gs:0, ax /* m -> */
> movq 16(AX), BX
> ..
> movq BX, SP
>
> This is familiar code but a bit different than what I'm used to.
>
> I can't understand it from how Mach is defined: the pointer at offset 16
> in Mach is to Proc.
>
> I've confirmed from qemu that this it is loading Proc, and as far as I'm
> concerned that means I don't know what's going on :-)
>
> what am I missing here?
>
> Thanks
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1173 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-15 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-15 7:10 [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
2025-02-15 14:40 ` Dan Cross
2025-02-15 16:22 ` [9front] pc64/l.s ron minnich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).