From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,
	SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 20476 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 12:13:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 1ess.inri.net) (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 12:13:24 -0000
Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]) by 1ess; Tue Jan  5 07:10:29 -0500 2021
Received: by mail-vk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id s13so6870451vkb.11
        for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:10:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=x0dWw4EOhwz8NtFnwjtazzZA+bKfLDKPnVnvN4sg5ZY=;
        b=frcOH6pWibz7Qr0saYZn/wlAqhFUGJrWIpZae6PkNaPuS1He+4Kut1G2W//aC14b6W
         0/dD3D1FDhs/yJLcCuvYFBMt74KGrA1ukdnbIYIW4cXCYG028KulNlG2p/GHaCzcak3H
         OEE7dBThz9gphqqVao6JFuqF76fRF0tEnuIa09dVHE4AxYe4yZYFOdgU70l1/9PXk5Y8
         UyPPljivozHb2e8NkLtGvClbah0MXkLU5y7GtLycM6n8AzAk844j3VdtPrFAT1EYhd5P
         waDnBpMIL8Wr4TnwL2ajyPo8y441hi3n+tt2FJFmVgnS2fHfAWxBd807XhGsGW8eJXum
         yN/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=x0dWw4EOhwz8NtFnwjtazzZA+bKfLDKPnVnvN4sg5ZY=;
        b=EPOgPdYqPfTqE21kzXWtG4y62b0+pgX4RBuhqtDHAlCA5Z1ZAEb2oMSpN5gOIJKoD1
         acea9pmmG52Xqx0UbSfhnpcW4Si3BVamh8KOkO6TEHugyUDztVo/hwRZfjnz/qOhqMHy
         U/m1MDCM6Qt2K0buM4fBKldSKkJDqdPRgl/wLd5NUaJUZUIVaOxXZodrusqPL+pLNrW7
         ncBmXIpb+BNEyekIjgXKAvpWwiLBxhigs9bfoidOk78lv8wJ02uPD37TTBz5JVRkoqCJ
         1EeRlS2JmaJaa4D8igBGsebPrZTAc1hj3wa60mHAOmz8BxQi9uBeU0S04I2nozi9JPRO
         VJWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uXSnanFYwF0Ku6qTm4W2Hws/upJk4Kp+4pKk+Qurj4S05/3EI
	2GQ3azO6si4t33ZCkCc3ZjVZmqcQkzSGBj9VhL+Thf4YL0M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo/8dU8crOZfnnEDRi25g6bEwPiOkRGaPhZcbMBioke4bsLAJIX/GELR7KIRsVgqp07tsJLnpzbAWpTc1xQ1Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:4ec7:: with SMTP id c190mr40181953vkb.11.1609848620511;
 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:10:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Jonas Amoson <jonas.amoson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:10:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF46DJ5Y9camL60fyeX8AR7_p+mBSdRHeVxXj2fSOGLip=wjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000002b6d3f05b826174c"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: patented decentralized full-stack locator 
Subject: [9front] Change of Hashsize in acid (slow startup on netsurf)
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

--0000000000002b6d3f05b826174c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

It is slow to debug netsurf with acid, as it takes a long time to load
all the symbols from the binary. It is the process of checking if a
symbol has been encountered before, the function unique(), that makes
the loading slow.

Changing Hashsize from 128 to 32768 in acid takes down the loading
time from 4 minutes to 8 seconds for me (45 times faster). Philippe
reported a similar speed increase (30x from 15 min to 30 sec).

I don't know if it is desirable to change the hashsize in the 9front
repo, as it probably is only netsurf that has so many symbols to load,
that it matters. But it might be that it doesn't harm anything either.

/Jonas

--0000000000002b6d3f05b826174c
X-Attachment-Id: f_kjjy5yq10
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-fisqijelshxibxhahzaaqweghl"
Content-Disposition: inline

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-fisqijelshxibxhahzaaqweghl
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

from postmaster@1ess:
The following attachment had content that we can't
prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
execution, we changed the content headers.
The original header was:

	Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="acid.patch"
	Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="acid.patch"
	Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
	Content-ID: <f_kjjy5yq10>
--upas-fisqijelshxibxhahzaaqweghl
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="acid.patch.suspect"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

LS0tIGEvc3lzL3NyYy9jbWQvYWNpZC9hY2lkLmgKKysrIGIvc3lzL3NyYy9jbWQvYWNpZC9hY2lk
LmgKQEAgLTMsNyArMyw3IEBACiB7CiAJRW9mCQk9IC0xLAogCVN0cnNpemUJCT0gNDA5NiwKLQlI
YXNoc2l6ZQk9IDEyOCwKKwlIYXNoc2l6ZQk9IDMyNzY4LAogCU1heGFyZwkJPSA1MTIsCiAJTkZE
CQk9IDEwMCwKIAlNYXhwcm9jCQk9IDUwLAo=
--upas-fisqijelshxibxhahzaaqweghl--