From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24839 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 05:53:53 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 05:53:53 -0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f43.google.com ([209.85.167.43]) by 9front; Tue Oct 24 01:46:38 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-lf1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507a29c7eefso6097468e87.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:46:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698126394; x=1698731194; darn=9front.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ocbBkZa02Vpxp6wNmTwH27NtnvEhVVlvN+NseWQryhE=; b=ZM6zPf/jmBhcktDRI32hAlmjkhq8cJNPW4COTPOwQ1HRZRNhRwfNgMOl7Hoo/eoLPo ATInpdDrEQeZovFhwI2dNzsJUeagjrKHfQ+uW6mTUWn+2qitUP/DZjNeMjMXYeovPUAu WtvT1PZcCQoDTKGaflReWMUfZHq9Q39cYyVzGGSSpN75iU4pEXaBe+emP2SUg1ig36HF 4Zl1y8lboLMJ7+0GdK3ksOmZVKNlY3gCJ2i3dm8ce3VuyowzUolBAH+HE7gXXSzR+WVm JeKaHdAuqJeIoZp0t/TiaP5IPkzsBipsuGHZqtMRdaHaV4t9HbkDd60E7DnPR2eMW0PT DZ6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698126394; x=1698731194; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ocbBkZa02Vpxp6wNmTwH27NtnvEhVVlvN+NseWQryhE=; b=E5ifzzTdIxnv0ztM1obr3Ff4vR9kqVS2dIZMaJDOESN/e8fg2sMRau8+d77cd7sb5N xOgrOzV29g8/IO9Qq9/EOXPLAn+8xM42zaWwaw6Zw05pfxh1frQxxcJduPFXhzONT7qP uU0IMl6hnRB0RTmh2uBU3tvkyu9WELpNJ0lpqIzi3eZhvzlAFwD7ZHGUX8VU36BDCE53 QG4ZdLtCIKgfADF08ptjygc/uAheosxWS0xMFOFmPxahRq+BdubiWU2inBL6IBWmJ8vw nvpdVqjvsqjbPz2U3xhk4HBTAQSnDueIzljBePlfeavplYQ6I4m4FuUIxQxy3lxIEUCs 2FsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPw3WLHKDTAA298/7t8tq9145HuqN+zk0i8skq0ufJ+hL9fb3K 78AxVpjDsPAeYoaH7ldsRlNphtU70+bMh/N7zubWMNcHqxE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDaSvYfCwtFytTMFvFx7R6W8Gdd5X+q84awS07JIAMp7CmnX1DYu0J9PEqvy/w/lYzOL3XSfIGONMnyAD2Vj0= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a5d:0:b0:500:ac10:1641 with SMTP id r29-20020ac25a5d000000b00500ac101641mr7873816lfn.46.1698126394318; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:46:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> <553d4b18-df20-45d6-b8ce-b9bd4f6b4320@invalid.invalid> In-Reply-To: From: Lucas Francesco Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 02:46:17 -0300 Message-ID: To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: patented component event-based property hosting Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk This bug report is wrong and your communication skills suck. libaml does RECOGNIZE opcode 0x86 (NotifyOP, I recommend you to check up Onotify in optab[]), and that's generally unrelated to battery handling AFAIK, you may be referring to DefNotify, which is defined as: "DefNotify := NotifyOp NotifyObject NotifyValue". There's no documented need for DefNotify and nobody would implement it because of some random person just pointing at it without even bringing up an actual bug. On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 00:54, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: > > On 10/23/23 23:37, Kurt H Maier wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:32:20PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: > >>> I seen't how that justifies of the problem itself caring, of which to > >> which your statement in reference to was. > > > > You're an idiot, then. > Rude. > > If your machine is worth supporting, people will > > care. > This problem'sn't unique particularly to this machine. 'Tis of the lib. > 'Tis general. > > Sysinfo output is the easiest way to make that determination. > > Once again, you're not qualified to identify which information is > > relevant. > > > If of this so certain you're, explain why should also you be, no? > >> If you, as an english speaker, can parse that sentence, it is a valid > >> english sentence. Back on topic, that does not clarify. > > > > Plenty of valid English sentences are shit. Most of yours have been. > > > 'Tisn't but m'dialect, man. > >> Ah, i see what you're trying to do there now. You're not going to succeed > >> in it. > > > > I strongly recommend you return any stolen property as quickly as > > possible. > I plead the fifth.