From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 18107 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2021 16:25:34 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Jul 2021 16:25:34 -0000
Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]) by 1ess; Tue Jul 13 12:21:35 -0400 2021
Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 17so20142446pfz.4
        for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=oBLZd/HEcMt2WrTi6kWOnNt6+P7a4IMcrN8h9Q39E7g=;
        b=P73Rdcob2YdXQESP+ksQAFVLQ7l4xtVNjytRBxr9LhF35gEZ1WpDSO/kKHhizyVxzS
         Ky3yMN3XBCtdGhgmn13ILR/SKTfJYlO5HzJ6vl1jJbF45UerztpmuNT+4ya3uq9agEjs
         prtw1iLWRseBJj/5Hm7AU2zEBgH9+pkz1WrrORlv55ORScnIrtvC2zdzPl8tQNOA/Y9H
         I1KMeeNvRdtfl0JC5IJI7SGn7HWZSAB5tpfRVg9wDPFw7i7ygSe3jfWY/JxWFOuPGAme
         g6Rmo+R53RiPltc89sf31YwO70HjRsqvDm8oQ5juZJl9DPXcHI8OvgzGa6u3LUx9xuxH
         Xjsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=oBLZd/HEcMt2WrTi6kWOnNt6+P7a4IMcrN8h9Q39E7g=;
        b=CZ2gtlnIWno0nAmmthUf+bQyEW+qbxXMYy90kD4gMkO3hBZxpMKzzGXFvJjLtyv4VN
         5SHEr1XkiEU0HBQDGUCNhYeojgzEIys18kORd3dQkLQGlihsqbQI112rIiqFe3UZUqQ/
         PrJBQNMO0xUk+Z/hRLamIa4wiVgQW3XVJkSHjMbmk3Al8mUbl++o/N3ZsE0j4AUhyHUM
         jmuJxcFuVvesMfA5eFzHN/HF9RjFc9h/qERxocxWSp/AarSA7afLLJjhvOjT33bOx87+
         NX0pNkF53Lf6VGoqC8VwOQnZQluoW4XELCPyJQ5689r1Kf/+Lt72WVpSwHml2mT5duTX
         Ixkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LcLj3A8RAa5GOpcni9qZQdX2kiDkYGifMOq8W1G1jxEokU5Mm
	CuJuvBKx6XNun+jMRsW8hpoW+KhMgug8SnvMXltnnfjM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqWM+CduUgvh2W4VA8eGYRRNLadb+Jbm603zZZKsnQSuZ1uAnABImLEU594o43jRnXOiDQ7DWvCMYOhd2s9VQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:3e0a:: with SMTP id l10mr5025308pga.141.1626193292011;
 Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a002:b029:1e:dcb9:6f96 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2021
 09:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO-8SKMGmQ84QCM8gGdgVP0L-PERGDgb_rGJqg-DQPM=XA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA85C879ggSM=fPu+CcgToakbhMh2Rk=A5gn3AWsPUqUYGFckQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8CE29EA89CBA8F74C1D4D8EEF2528473@eigenstate.org> <CAA85C87qdQe6Bj6E4XvGwgOd7_cgQOJ4Yiv8tRhL4pEzzMTqQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFSF3XPsOK5f2-5s1ZG=nSEP+ejng+vLfZZ+J_iX=RuTTpoYjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA85C84DWyYoo-y4-errRfwvgFyktO+faRGhA6JdMunwOfvWCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABB-WO9KD40paOd-hnHsqGoq_0=6s4uoW_xmXJNwd15Zx5Yhvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFSF3XPhDeKiKXdsL0Abnderm45Uc2GCPYsi6ygSaBkf7gDBmA@mail.gmail.com> <CABB-WO-8SKMGmQ84QCM8gGdgVP0L-PERGDgb_rGJqg-DQPM=XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 18:21:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XM8YvXPxnQp0aRmxuanr-pe-YQcRowF+E3ORQu2hsu1bQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: wrapper content-driven interface 
Subject: Re: [9front] Mouse clipping patch
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

ah, only now i understand the point. agreed.
for the few shortcuts that we have the rule is to give it on as deep
as possible.
if anything else is wished, it is not possible.

ESC, DEL and scrolllock seem to be the few rare exceptions where this
doesn't matter.

maybe this is actually the stronger reason why historically keyboard
shortcuts have rarely been used/implemented in rio.

On 7/13/21, Stuart Morrow <morrow.stuart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/07/2021, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> no, that is never a problem as rio forwards the keyboard commands to
>> the relevant selected subprocess (scrollock, DEL and ESC keys for
>> example).
>
> How about keyboard-based resizing, deleting, etc that some people seem
> to want? Which rio do *those* commands go to? How do you decide? You
> can't just give up being able to close any window where cons is set to
> raw - most of the time it *won't* be a subrio.
>